These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2701123)

  • 1. [Individual tray composed of two parts for functional impressions in case of pterygoid defects].
    Orlicki R; Jaworska M; Kasperski J
    Protet Stomatol; 1989; 39(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2701123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different labio-lingual spaces in tray designs on the displacement of and pressure against a mobile tooth.
    Nishi Y; Tsuru K; Kishita C; Kamashita Y; Hamano T; Nagaoka E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Sep; 35(9):700-5. PubMed ID: 18793354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Custom sectional impression trays with interlocking type handle for microstomia patients.
    Fernandes AS; Mascarenhas K; Aras MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):370-3. PubMed ID: 19884726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Why should we use plaster for the prime impression in complete removable prosthodontics].
    Koffi NJ; Koffi KG; Assi KD
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2005 Sep; 28(111):17-22. PubMed ID: 16398307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-way trays: easy to use and abuse.
    Pesun IJ; Swain VL
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 74(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 19126360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
    Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional impression and jaw registration: a single session procedure for the construction of complete dentures.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Kettner N; Reppert G; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):554-61. PubMed ID: 15189312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making an implant-level impression using solid plastic, press-fit, closed-tray impression copings: a clinical report.
    Selecman AM; Wicks RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 19231566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-office technique to fabricate triple tray.
    Nanda A; Kaur H; Koli D; Manak K; Verma M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(6):648-51. PubMed ID: 26888248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A custom impression tray made with the aid of an existing prosthesis: a clinical technique.
    Cain JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 11677532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A combined impression technique for a partial implant-supported fixed-detachable restoration.
    Kohavi D
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 9452684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.