These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27011734)

  • 41. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations.
    Tobi H; Kreulen CM; Vondeling H; van Amerongen WE
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Apr; 27(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 10226724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Pragmatic Study Shows Failure of Dental Composite Fillings Is Genetically Determined: A Contribution to the Discussion on Dental Amalgams.
    Vieira AR; Silva MB; Souza KKA; Filho AVA; Rosenblatt A; Modesto A
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2017; 4():186. PubMed ID: 29164121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Marginal microleakage of resin-retained bridges in association with existing resin composite and amalgam restorations.
    Saunders WP
    Dent Mater; 1990 Jan; 6(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2198181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 12 Years of Repair of Amalgam and Composite Resins: A Clinical Study.
    Estay J; Martín J; Viera V; Valdivieso J; Bersezio C; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Andrade MF; Moraes RR; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 28976841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials.
    Mjör IA; Jokstad A
    J Dent; 1993 Dec; 21(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 8258583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):369-78; discussion 379. PubMed ID: 16417833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical evaluation and marginal leakage of Amalgambond Plus: three-year results.
    Olmez A; Cula S; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Oct; 28(10):651-6. PubMed ID: 9477885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The comparative evaluation of fracture resistance and microleakage in bonded amalgam, amalgam, and composite resins in primary molars.
    Vanishree HS; Shanthala BM; Bobby W
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 26672412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical performance of Class I nanohybrid composite restorations with resin-modified glass-ionomer liner and flowable composite liner: A randomized clinical trial.
    Suhasini K; Madhusudhana K; Suneelkumar C; Lavanya A; Chandrababu KS; Kumar PD
    J Conserv Dent; 2016; 19(6):510-515. PubMed ID: 27994310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.