These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27011737)

  • 1. In vitro assessment of the accuracy of extraoral periapical radiography in root length determination.
    Nazeer MR; Khan FR; Rahman M
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 27011737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Intraoral and Extraoral Periapical Radiographic Techniques in Determination of Working Length: An
    Sridhara A; Konde S; Noojadi SR; Kumar NC; Belludi AC
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 32904081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Value of Extraoral Periapical Radiograph in Comparison to Intraoral Periapical Radiograph: A Cross-sectional, Institutional Study.
    Mishra I; Karjodkar FR; Sansare K; Dora AC; Tambawala SS; Kapoor R; Sharma SR
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):406-409. PubMed ID: 30166835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extraoral periapical radiography: an alternative approach to intraoral periapical radiography.
    Kumar R; Khambete N; Priya E
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Dec; 41(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 22232725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Use of an Alternative Extraoral Periapical Technique for Patients with Severe Gag Reflex.
    E Silva MH; Coelho MS; Santos MF; de Lima CO; Campos CN
    Case Rep Dent; 2016; 2016():3206845. PubMed ID: 27547474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the selection of maxillary anterior teeth using intraoral and extraoral anatomical landmarks.
    Ellakwa A; McNamara K; Sandhu J; James K; Arora A; Klineberg I; El-Sheikh A; Martin FE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):414-21. PubMed ID: 22269230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film and digital periapical radiographs for the measurement of apical root shortening.
    El-Angbawi AM; McIntyre GT; Bearn DR; Thomson DJ
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2012 Dec; 4(5):e281-5. PubMed ID: 24455036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.
    Terry GL; Noujeim M; Langlais RP; Moore WS; Prihoda TJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150159. PubMed ID: 26869221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Root Resorption and Root Shape by Periapical and Panoramic Radiographs: A Comparative Study.
    Ahuja PD; Mhaske SP; Mishra G; Bhardwaj A; Dwivedi R; Mangalekar SB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):479-483. PubMed ID: 28621278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The diagnostic value of lateral extraoral radiography for intruded maxillary primary incisors.
    Holan G; Ram D; Fuks AB
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11874057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Micro-Computed Tomography and Digital Intraoral Radiography to Determine the Accuracy of Digital Radiographic Measurements of Mandibular Molar Teeth in Dogs.
    Marron L; Rawlinson J; McGilvray K; Prytherch B
    J Vet Dent; 2017 Dec; 34(4):248-258. PubMed ID: 28974160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An aiming device for an extraoral radiographic technique.
    Chen CH; Lin SH; Chiu HL; Lin YJ; Chen YK; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):758-60. PubMed ID: 17509422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of digital radiography and apex locator with the conventional method in root length determination of primary teeth.
    Neena IE; Ananthraj A; Praveen P; Karthik V; Rani P
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 22016313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age estimation using intraoral periapical radiographs.
    Rajpal PS; Krishnamurthy V; Pagare SS; Sachdev GD
    J Forensic Dent Sci; 2016; 8(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 27051226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Panoramic and restrictive intraoral radiography in comprehensive oral radiographic diagnosis.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1995 Aug; 103(4):191-8. PubMed ID: 7552948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiographs in diagnosis of lingual-simulated external root resorptions.
    Bernardes RA; de Paulo RS; Pereira LO; Duarte MA; Ordinola-Zapata R; de Azevedo JR
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Aug; 28(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 22233265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
    Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
    Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.