84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27012116)
1. Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus etoposide versus cyclophosphamide alone.
Jurczyszyn A; Vesole DH; Gdula-Argasińska J; Giza A; Zawirska D; Baster J; Walter Z; Węglarska D; Dadej A; Castillos JJ; Skotnicki AB
Przegl Lek; 2015; 72(11):606-10. PubMed ID: 27012116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Optimization of mobilization regimes of blood hemopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].
Pokrovskaia OS; Mendeleeva LP; Urnova ES; Gaponova TV; Gribanova EO; Alekseeva IV; Drokov MIu; Kalinin NN; Gretsov EM; Kliasova GA; Savchenko VG
Ter Arkh; 2011; 83(7):50-7. PubMed ID: 21894752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of gradual increment in rhG-CSF dose on stem cell yields in patients with multiple myeloma mobilized with intermediate dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF.
Hacıoğlu S; Sarı I; Doğu MH; Keskin A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Feb; 50(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 24342458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No polarization of type 1 or type 2 precursor dendritic cells in peripheral blood stem cell collections of non-hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF, GM-CSF, or GM-CSF followed by G-CSF.
Gazitt Y; Akay C; Thomas C
Stem Cells Dev; 2006 Apr; 15(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 16646673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-dose cyclophosphamide with or without etoposide for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and toxicity.
Gojo I; Guo C; Sarkodee-Adoo C; Meisenberg B; Fassas A; Rapoport AP; Cottler-Fox M; Heyman M; Takebe N; Tricot G
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jul; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 15133484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-dose etoposide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as an effective chemomobilization regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma previously treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy: a study from the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma.
Hyun SY; Cheong JW; Kim SJ; Min YH; Yang DH; Ahn JS; Lee WS; Ryoo HM; Do YR; Lee HS; Lee JH; Oh SY; Suh C; Yhim HY; Kim JS
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2014 Jan; 20(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 24141009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for multiple myeloma.
Shimura Y; Kuroda J; Uchiyama H; Kawata-Iida E; Tsutsumi Y; Nagoshi H; Mizutani S; Yamamoto-Sugitani M; Matsumoto Y; Kobayashi T; Horiike S; Shimazaki C; Kaneko H; Kobayashi Y; Taniwaki M
J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 23804501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blood progenitor cell (BPC) mobilization studied in multiple myeloma, solid tumor and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients after combination chemotherapy and G-CSF.
Engelhardt M; Winkler J; Waller C; Lange W; Mertelsmann R; Henschler R
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Mar; 19(6):529-37. PubMed ID: 9181898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens.
Stewart DA; Guo D; Morris D; Poon MC; Ruether BA; Jones AR; Klassen J; Auer I; Luider J; Chaudhry A; Brown C; Russell JA
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10197794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide in combination with G-CSF, GM-CSF, or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a randomized prospective study.
Gazitt Y; Callander N; Freytes CO; Shaughnessy P; Liu Q; Tsai TW; Devore P
J Hematother Stem Cell Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):737-48. PubMed ID: 11091498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective comparison of mobilization methods for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Nakasone H; Kanda Y; Ueda T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu N; Minami J; Sakai R; Hagihara M; Yokota A; Oshima K; Tsukada Y; Tachibana T; Nakaseko C; Fujisawa S; Yano S; Fujita H; Takahashi S; Kanamori H; Okamoto S;
Am J Hematol; 2009 Dec; 84(12):809-14. PubMed ID: 19862826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
Demirer T; Buckner CD; Gooley T; Appelbaum FR; Rowley S; Chauncey T; Lilleby K; Storb R; Bensinger WI
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jun; 17(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 8807097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose ifosfamide + GM-CSF vs high-dose cyclophosphamide + GM-CSF for blood progenitor cell mobilization.
Vela-Ojeda J; Tripp-Villanueva F; Montiel-Cervantes L; Sánchez-Cortés E; Ayala-Sánchez M; Guevara-Moreno ME; García-León LD; Rosas-Cabral A; Esparza MA; González-Llaven J
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jun; 25(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 10849526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with vinorelbine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in multiple myeloma patients is reliable and cost effective.
Bargetzi MJ; Passweg J; Baertschi E; Schoenenberger A; Gwerder C; Tichelli A; Burger J; Mingrone W; Herrmann R; Gratwohl A; Wernli M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2003 Jan; 31(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 12621490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
