BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27012445)

  • 1. Fecal hemoglobin concentration is useful for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia.
    Kim NH; Kwon MJ; Kim HY; Lee T; Jeong SH; Park DI; Choi K; Jung YS
    Dig Liver Dis; 2016 Jun; 48(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 27012445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia according to fecal hemoglobin concentration in a colorectal cancer screening program.
    Auge JM; Pellise M; Escudero JM; Hernandez C; Andreu M; Grau J; Buron A; López-Cerón M; Bessa X; Serradesanferm A; Piracés M; Macià F; Guayta R; Filella X; Molina R; Jimenez W; Castells A;
    Gastroenterology; 2014 Sep; 147(3):628-636.e1. PubMed ID: 24937264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of time to colonoscopy after a positive fecal test result and fecal hemoglobin concentration with risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia.
    Kim NH; Lim JW; Kim S; Lim JY; Kim W; Park JH; Park DI; Sohn CI; Jung YS
    Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Apr; 51(4):589-594. PubMed ID: 30733186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A combination of clinical risk stratification and fecal immunochemical test is useful for identifying persons with high priority of early colonoscopy.
    Jung YS; Park CH; Kim NH; Park JH; Park DI; Sohn CI
    Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Mar; 50(3):254-259. PubMed ID: 29198569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Increasing Screening Age and Fecal Hemoglobin Cutoff Concentrations in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Wieten E; Schreuders EH; Nieuwenburg SA; Hansen BE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Bruno MJ; Spaander MC
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 14(12):1771-1777. PubMed ID: 27567693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?
    Arana-Arri E; Idigoras I; Uranga B; Pérez R; Irurzun A; Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I; Fraser CG; Portillo I;
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):577. PubMed ID: 28851318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender Differences in Fecal Immunochemical Test Performance for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia.
    Kapidzic A; van der Meulen MP; Hol L; van Roon AH; Looman CW; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; Reijerink JC; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Aug; 13(8):1464-71.e4. PubMed ID: 25724706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equivalency of fecal immunochemical tests and colonoscopy in familial colorectal cancer screening.
    Quintero E; Carrillo M; Gimeno-García AZ; Hernández-Guerra M; Nicolás-Pérez D; Alonso-Abreu I; Díez-Fuentes ML; Abraira V
    Gastroenterology; 2014 Nov; 147(5):1021-30.e1; quiz e16-7. PubMed ID: 25127679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: Colonoscopy findings by different cut-off levels.
    Ribbing Wilén H; Blom J; Höijer J; Hultcrantz R
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 29968937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association Between Concentrations of Hemoglobin Determined by Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Long-term Development of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia.
    Grobbee EJ; Schreuders EH; Hansen BE; Bruno MJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Kuipers EJ
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Nov; 153(5):1251-1259.e2. PubMed ID: 28760383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individualized colorectal cancer screening based on the clinical risk factors: beyond family history of colorectal cancer.
    Park CH; Kim NH; Park JH; Park DI; Sohn CI; Jung YS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jul; 88(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 29510145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Meijer GA; van Ballegooijen M; van Roon AH; Stegeman I; Kraaijenhagen RA; Fockens P; van Leerdam ME; Dekker E; Kuipers EJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 107(10):1570-8. PubMed ID: 22850431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faecal haemoglobin concentration is related to detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the next screening round.
    Digby J; Fraser CG; Carey FA; Diament RH; Balsitis M; Steele RJ
    J Med Screen; 2017 Jun; 24(2):62-68. PubMed ID: 27370211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fecal immunochemical testing results and characteristics of colonic lesions.
    van Doorn SC; Stegeman I; Stroobants AK; Mundt MW; de Wijkerslooth TR; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E
    Endoscopy; 2015 Nov; 47(11):1011-7. PubMed ID: 26126163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A combination of clinical risk stratification and fecal immunochemical test results to prioritize colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic participants.
    Aniwan S; Rerknimitr R; Kongkam P; Wisedopas N; Ponuthai Y; Chaithongrat S; Kullavanijaya P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):719-27. PubMed ID: 25708760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).
    Breekveldt ECH; Toes-Zoutendijk E; de Jonge L; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; van Kemenade FJ; van Vuuren AJ; Ramakers CRB; Nagtegaal ID; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):45. PubMed ID: 36814185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with interval colorectal cancer after negative FIT: Results of two screening rounds in the Dutch FIT-based CRC screening program.
    Breekveldt ECH; Toes-Zoutendijk E; van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ; de Jonge L; Kooyker AI; Spaander MCW; van Vuuren AJ; van Kemenade FJ; Ramakers C; Dekker E; Nagtegaal ID; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Int J Cancer; 2023 Apr; 152(8):1536-1546. PubMed ID: 36444504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Faecal haemoglobin concentration among subjects with negative FIT results is associated with the detection rate of neoplasia at subsequent rounds: a prospective study in the context of population based screening programmes in Italy.
    Senore C; Zappa M; Campari C; Crotta S; Armaroli P; Arrigoni A; Cassoni P; Colla R; Fracchia M; Gili F; Grazzini G; Lolli R; Menozzi P; Orione L; Polizzi S; Rapi S; Riggi E; Rubeca T; Sassatelli R; Visioli C; Segnan N
    Gut; 2020 Mar; 69(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 31455608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantile-based fecal hemoglobin concentration for assessing colorectal neoplasms with 1,263,717 Taiwanese screenees.
    Peng SM; Chiu HM; Jen HH; Hsu CY; Chen SL; Chiu SY; Yen AM; Fann JC; Lee YC; Chen HH
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 May; 19(1):94. PubMed ID: 31046760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Low Threshold Value Use Improve Proximal Neoplasia Detection by Fecal Immunochemical Test?
    Kim NH; Yang HJ; Park SK; Park JH; Park DI; Sohn CI; Choi K; Jung YS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(9):2685-93. PubMed ID: 27107865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.