232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27013278)
1. Establishing Benchmarks For Minimum Competence With Dry Lab Robotic Surgery Drills.
Siddiqui NY; Tarr ME; Geller EJ; Advincula AP; Galloway ML; Green IC; Hur HC; Pitter MC; Burke EE; Martino MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 27013278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of Virtual Reality Simulation and Dry Lab Robotic Technical Skills.
Newcomb LK; Bradley MS; Truong T; Tang M; Comstock B; Li YJ; Visco AG; Siddiqui NY
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):689-696. PubMed ID: 29154932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crowdsourcing: a valid alternative to expert evaluation of robotic surgery skills.
Polin MR; Siddiqui NY; Comstock BA; Hesham H; Brown C; Lendvay TS; Martino MA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):644.e1-644.e7. PubMed ID: 27365004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy Biotissue Curriculum has Validity and Improves Technical Performance for Surgical Oncology Fellows.
Tam V; Zenati M; Novak S; Chen Y; Zureikat AH; Zeh HJ; Hogg ME
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1057-1065. PubMed ID: 28578981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Training the next generation of robotic surgeons using guided mentorship: a randomized controlled trial.
Liang MI; McCann GA; Rath KS; Backes FJ; Cansino C; Salani R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 24893325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crowdsourced Assessment of Inanimate Biotissue Drills: A Valid and Cost-Effective Way to Evaluate Surgical Trainees.
Rice MK; Zenati MS; Novak SM; Al Abbas AI; Zureikat AH; Zeh HJ; Hogg ME
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(3):814-823. PubMed ID: 30472061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective assessment in residency-based training for transoral robotic surgery.
Curry M; Malpani A; Li R; Tantillo T; Jog A; Blanco R; Ha PK; Califano J; Kumar R; Richmon J
Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2184-92. PubMed ID: 22915265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarks for the interpretation of esophageal high-resolution manometry.
Yadlapati R; Keswani RN; Dunbar KB; Gawron AJ; Gyawali CP; Kahrilas PJ; Katz PO; Katzka D; Spechler SJ; Tatum R; Pandolfino JE
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Apr; 29(4):. PubMed ID: 27739183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Competency in Robotic Surgery: Standard Setting for Robotic Suturing Using Objective Assessment and Expert Evaluation.
Haque TF; Knudsen JE; You J; Hui A; Djaladat H; Ma R; Cen S; Goldenberg M; Hung AJ
J Surg Educ; 2024 Mar; 81(3):422-430. PubMed ID: 38290967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible?
Meier M; Horton K; John H
J Robot Surg; 2016 Dec; 10(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 27334771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residents perform better technically, have less stress and workload, and prefer robotic to laparoscopic technique during inanimate simulation.
Choi SH; Kuchta K; Rojas A; Mehdi SA; Ramirez Barriga M; Hays S; Talamonti MS; Hogg ME
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7230-7237. PubMed ID: 37395804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance.
Ro CY; Toumpoulis IK; Ashton RC; Imielinska C; Jebara T; Shin SH; Zipkin JD; McGinty JJ; Todd GJ; Derose JJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():418-21. PubMed ID: 15718771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.
Dubin AK; Smith R; Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 28757439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of the robotic Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills.
Siddiqui NY; Galloway ML; Geller EJ; Green IC; Hur HC; Langston K; Pitter MC; Tarr ME; Martino MA
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 24807319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS).
Sánchez R; Rodríguez O; Rosciano J; Vegas L; Bond V; Rojas A; Sanchez-Ismayel A
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 27039189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively.
Anderson DD; Long S; Thomas GW; Putnam MD; Bechtold JE; Karam MD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):874-81. PubMed ID: 26502107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continued Validation of the O-SCORE (Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation): Use in the Simulated Environment.
MacEwan MJ; Dudek NL; Wood TJ; Gofton WT
Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 26787087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing objective benchmarks in robotic virtual reality simulation at the level of a competent surgeon using the RobotiX Mentor simulator.
Watkinson W; Raison N; Abe T; Harrison P; Khan S; Van der Poel H; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
Postgrad Med J; 2018 May; 94(1111):270-277. PubMed ID: 29511043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
