199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27013638)
1. Radiologist-initiated double reading of abdominal CT: retrospective analysis of the clinical importance of changes to radiology reports.
Lauritzen PM; Andersen JG; Stokke MV; Tennstrand AL; Aamodt R; Heggelund T; Dahl FA; Sandbæk G; Hurlen P; Gulbrandsen P
BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Aug; 25(8):595-603. PubMed ID: 27013638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double reading of current chest CT examinations: Clinical importance of changes to radiology reports.
Lauritzen PM; Stavem K; Andersen JG; Stokke MV; Tennstrand AL; Bjerke G; Hurlen P; Sandbæk G; Dahl FA; Gulbrandsen P
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 26724666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Concordance" Revisited: A Multispecialty Appraisal of "Concordant" Preliminary Abdominopelvic CT Reports.
Brown JM; Dickerson EC; Rabinowitz LC; Cohan RH; Ellis JH; Litell JM; Kaza RK; Lopez AN; Theyyunni NR; Weber JT; Kocher KE; Davenport MS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 27338216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations: selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist.
Brealey S; Piper K; King D; Bland M; Caddick J; Campbell P; Gibbon A; Highland A; Jenkins N; Petty D; Warren D
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e597-605. PubMed ID: 23791130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of pediatric abdominal CT scans performed at a dedicated children's hospital and its referring institutions: a multifactorial evaluation.
Snow A; Milliren CE; Graham DA; Callahan MJ; MacDougall RD; Robertson RL; Taylor GA
Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Apr; 47(4):391-397. PubMed ID: 28084504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of the physical exam: double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiologic interpretation of ventral hernias after selective clinical information.
Cherla DV; Bernardi K; Blair KJ; Chua SS; Hasapes JP; Kao LS; Ko TC; Matta EJ; Moses ML; Shiralkar KG; Surabhi VR; Tammisetti VS; Viso CP; Liang MK
Hernia; 2019 Oct; 23(5):987-994. PubMed ID: 30430273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The added value of a second read by pediatric radiologists for outside skeletal surveys.
Karmazyn B; Wanner MR; Marine MB; Tilmans L; Jennings SG; Hibbard RA
Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Feb; 49(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 30367201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care.
Hatzoglou V; Omuro AM; Haque S; Khakoo Y; Ganly I; Oh JH; Shukla-Dave A; Fatovic R; Gaal J; Holodny AI
Cancer; 2016 Sep; 122(17):2708-14. PubMed ID: 27219108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of interpretation of emergency abdominal CT in adult patients who present with non-traumatic abdominal pain: results of a UK national audit.
Howlett DC; Drinkwater K; Frost C; Higginson A; Ball C; Maskell G
Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27927488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Missed lesions at abdominal oncologic CT: lessons learned from quality assurance.
Siewert B; Sosna J; McNamara A; Raptopoulos V; Kruskal JB
Radiographics; 2008; 28(3):623-38. PubMed ID: 18480475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double reading rates and quality assurance practices in Norwegian hospital radiology departments: two parallel national surveys.
Lauritzen PM; Hurlen P; Sandbæk G; Gulbrandsen P
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 24425793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Second-Opinion Subspecialty Consultations in Musculoskeletal Radiology.
Chalian M; Del Grande F; Thakkar RS; Jalali SF; Chhabra A; Carrino JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1217-21. PubMed ID: 27058462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time Requirement and Feasibility of a Systematic Quality Peer Review of Reporting in Radiology.
Maurer MH; Brönnimann M; Schroeder C; Ghadamgahi E; Streitparth F; Heverhagen JT; Leichtle A; de Bucourt M; Meyl TP
Rofo; 2021 Feb; 193(2):160-167. PubMed ID: 32698235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double Reading of Outsourced CT/MR Radiology Reports: Retrospective Analysis.
Vendrell JF; Frandon J; Boussat B; Cotton F; Ferretti G; Sans N; Tasu JP; Beregi JP; Larbi A
J Patient Saf; 2021 Dec; 17(8):e1267-e1271. PubMed ID: 30531236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of QUIP (quality information program) as a semi-automated quality assessment endeavor allowing retrospective review of errors in cross-sectional abdominal imaging.
Kielar AZ; McInnes M; Quan M; O'Sullivan J
Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1358-64. PubMed ID: 21855370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographs in the office: is a second reading always needed?
Smith PD; Temte J; Beasley JW; Mundt M
J Am Board Fam Pract; 2004; 17(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 15243013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology.
Zan E; Yousem DM; Carone M; Lewin JS
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 20308451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications.
Eakins C; Ellis WD; Pruthi S; Johnson DP; Hernanz-Schulman M; Yu C; Kan JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):916-20. PubMed ID: 22997387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT studies by subspecialty experts in stroke imaging.
Jordan YJ; Jordan JE; Lightfoote JB; Ragland KD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 23169731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
