BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27014050)

  • 1. Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction of Structural MR Images: A Data-Driven Approach to Define Input Algorithm Parameters.
    Ganzetti M; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
    Front Neuroinform; 2016; 10():10. PubMed ID: 27014050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.
    Ganzetti M; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
    Neuroinformatics; 2016 Jan; 14(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 26306865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intensity non-uniformity correction in MR imaging using residual cycle generative adversarial network.
    Dai X; Lei Y; Liu Y; Wang T; Ren L; Curran WJ; Patel P; Liu T; Yang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215025. PubMed ID: 33245059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-acquisition correction of MR inhomogeneities.
    Lee SK; Vannier MW
    Magn Reson Med; 1996 Aug; 36(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 8843382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method for bias field correction of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error.
    Gispert JD; Reig S; Pascau J; Vaquero JJ; García-Barreno P; Desco M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Jun; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 15108301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial Fuzzy C Means and Expectation Maximization Algorithms with Bias Correction for Segmentation of MR Brain Images.
    Meena Prakash R; Shantha Selva Kumari R
    J Med Syst; 2017 Jan; 41(1):15. PubMed ID: 27966093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust generative asymmetric GMM for brain MR image segmentation.
    Ji Z; Xia Y; Zheng Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Nov; 151():123-138. PubMed ID: 28946994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient inhomogeneity compensation using fuzzy c-means clustering models.
    Szilágyi L; Szilágyi SM; Benyó B
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Oct; 108(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 22405524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of performance metrics for bias field correction in MR brain images.
    Chua ZY; Zheng W; Chee MW; Zagorodnov V
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1271-9. PubMed ID: 19472380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensity inhomogeneity correction of multispectral MR images.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16647862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction of Magnetic Resonance Images using Patches.
    Roy S; Carass A; Bazin PL; Prince JL
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2011 Mar; 7962():79621F. PubMed ID: 25077011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A level set method based on domain transformation and bias correction for MRI brain tumor segmentation.
    Khosravanian A; Rahmanimanesh M; Keshavarzi P; Mozaffari S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Mar; 352():109091. PubMed ID: 33515604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. COMPRESSED SENSING BASED INTENSITY NON-UNIFORMITY CORRECTION.
    Roy S; Carass A; Prince JL
    Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging; 2011 Dec; 2011():101-104. PubMed ID: 24443667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative assessment of statistical brain MR image segmentation algorithms and their impact on partial volume correction in PET.
    Zaidi H; Ruest T; Schoenahl F; Montandon ML
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1591-607. PubMed ID: 16828315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deep learning based correction of RF field induced inhomogeneities for T2w prostate imaging at 7 T.
    Harrevelt SD; Meliado EFM; van Lier ALHMW; Reesink D; Meijer RP; Pluim JPW; Raaijmakers AJE
    NMR Biomed; 2023 Dec; 36(12):e5019. PubMed ID: 37622473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A non-iterative multi-scale approach for intensity inhomogeneity correction in MRI.
    George MM; Kalaivani S; Sudhakar MS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 42():43-59. PubMed ID: 28549883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An adaptive spatial fuzzy clustering algorithm for 3-D MR image segmentation.
    Liew AW; Yan H
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1063-75. PubMed ID: 12956262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Single-Scan and Scan-Pair Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods on Repeatability of Voxel-Based Morphometry With Multiple Magnetic Resonance Scanners.
    Goto M; Yamashita F; Kawaguchi A; Abe O; Aoki S; Miyati T; Gomi T; Takeda T;
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 28786904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A modified method for MRF segmentation and bias correction of MR image with intensity inhomogeneity.
    Xie M; Gao J; Zhu C; Zhou Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Jan; 53(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 25304717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.