These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27014126)

  • 1. Significant Inter-Test Reliability across Approximate Number System Assessments.
    DeWind NK; Brannon EM
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():310. PubMed ID: 27014126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features.
    DeWind NK; Adams GK; Platt ML; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():247-65. PubMed ID: 26056747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual stimulus parameters seriously compromise the measurement of approximate number system acuity and comparative effects between adults and children.
    Szűcs D; Nobes A; Devine A; Gabriel FC; Gebuis T
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():444. PubMed ID: 23882245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.
    Price GR; Palmer D; Battista C; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 22445770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Approximate Number System: no relation between numerical comparison and estimation tasks.
    Guillaume M; Gevers W; Content A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 25742706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Numerical Comparison Tasks: A Meta-Analysis of the Variability of the Weber Fraction Relative to the Generation Algorithm.
    Guillaume M; Van Rinsveld A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1694. PubMed ID: 30271363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: the effect of mathematical ability.
    Guillaume M; Nys J; Mussolin C; Content A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 24096088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Approximate Number System Acuity Redefined: A Diffusion Model Approach.
    Park J; Starns JJ
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1955. PubMed ID: 26733929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indexing the approximate number system.
    Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():147-55. PubMed ID: 24361686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurophysiological signatures of approximate number system acuity in preschoolers.
    Pinhas M; Paulsen DJ; Woldorff MG; Brannon EM
    Trends Neurosci Educ; 2023 Mar; 30():100197. PubMed ID: 36925266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring acuity of the approximate number system reliably and validly: the evaluation of an adaptive test procedure.
    Lindskog M; Winman A; Juslin P; Poom L
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():510. PubMed ID: 23964256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent validity of approximate number sense tasks in adults and children.
    Smets K; Gebuis T; Defever E; Reynvoet B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():120-8. PubMed ID: 24875582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological aspects to be considered when measuring the approximate number system (ANS) - a research review.
    Dietrich JF; Huber S; Nuerk HC
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():295. PubMed ID: 25852612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training.
    Dewind NK; Brannon EM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():68. PubMed ID: 22529786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Numerical discrimination is mediated by neural coding variation.
    Prather RW
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):601-10. PubMed ID: 25238315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the social-emotional components of our "number sense": insights from a novel non-symbolic numerical comparison task.
    Mielicki MK; Mbarki R; Wang JJ
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1175591. PubMed ID: 38505363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to estimate how well people estimate: evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system.
    Chesney D; Bjalkebring P; Peters E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2781-802. PubMed ID: 26335207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical distance effect size is a poor metric of approximate number system acuity.
    Chesney D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 29651753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling from the mental number line: how are approximate number system representations formed?
    Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23831565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Acuity and Manipulability of the ANS Have Separable Influences on Preschoolers' Symbolic Math Achievement.
    Starr A; Tomlinson RC; Brannon EM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2554. PubMed ID: 30618975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.