252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27014152)
1. Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension.
Wendt D; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():345. PubMed ID: 27014152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users: The Effect of Speech Intelligibility, Noise Reduction Processing, and Working Memory Capacity on the Pupil Dilation Response.
Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):392-404. PubMed ID: 34898265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study.
Borghini G; Hazan V
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():152. PubMed ID: 29593489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech.
Müller JA; Wendt D; Kollmeier B; Debener S; Brand T
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():449. PubMed ID: 30906273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Do We Allocate Our Resources When Listening and Memorizing Speech in Noise? A Pupillometry Study.
Bönitz H; Lunner T; Finke M; Fiedler L; Lyxell B; Riis SK; Ng E; Valdes AL; Büchner A; Wendt D
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):846-859. PubMed ID: 33492008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of linguistic context and noise type on speech comprehension.
Fitzgerald LP; DeDe G; Shen J
Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1345619. PubMed ID: 38375107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Tipping Point in Listening Effort: Effects of Linguistic Complexity and Age-Related Hearing Loss on Sentence Comprehension.
Ayasse ND; Wingfield A
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518790907. PubMed ID: 30235973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Memory performance on the Auditory Inference Span Test is independent of background noise type for young adults with normal hearing at high speech intelligibility.
Rönnberg N; Rudner M; Lunner T; Stenfelt S
Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1490. PubMed ID: 25566159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.
Książek P; Zekveld AA; Fiedler L; Kramer SE; Wendt D
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pupil Responses of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury During Processing of Speech in Noise.
Koelewijn T; van Haastrecht JAP; Kramer SE
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518811444. PubMed ID: 30482105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults' report accuracy for verbal materials.
Stewart R; Wingfield A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 19927677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Processing Mechanisms in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Evidence from Reaction Times and Sentence Interpretation.
Carroll R; Uslar V; Brand T; Ruigendijk E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e391-e401. PubMed ID: 27748664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When Hearing Does Not Mean Understanding: On the Neural Processing of Syntactically Complex Sentences by Listeners With Hearing Loss.
Vogelzang M; Thiel CM; Rosemann S; Rieger JW; Ruigendijk E
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 64(1):250-262. PubMed ID: 33400550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Syntactic complexity differentially affects auditory sentence comprehension performance for individuals with age-related hearing loss.
Shin J; Noh S; Park J; Sung JE
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1264994. PubMed ID: 37965654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
