These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27014166)

  • 1. Experience that Much Work Produces Many Reinforcers Makes the Sunk Cost Fallacy in Pigeons: A Preliminary Test.
    Fujimaki S; Sakagami T
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():363. PubMed ID: 27014166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sunk cost effect in pigeons and people: a case of within-trials contrast?
    White KG; Magalhães P
    Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():22-8. PubMed ID: 25305066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sunk cost: pigeons (Columba livia), too, show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another.
    Pattison KF; Zentall TR; Watanabe S
    J Comp Psychol; 2012 Feb; 126(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21574688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of a prior investment on choice: the sunk cost effect.
    Magalhães P; White KG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):22-37. PubMed ID: 24893106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sunk cost and work ethic effects reflect suboptimal choice between different work requirements.
    Magalhães P; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():55-9. PubMed ID: 23274847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The feeling of throwing good money after bad: The role of affective reaction in the sunk-cost fallacy.
    Dijkstra KA; Hong YY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209900. PubMed ID: 30620741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sunk cost effect with pigeons: some determinants of decisions about persistence.
    Macaskill AC; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 22287806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The sunk cost effect in pigeons and humans.
    Navarro AD; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 15762377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rats behave optimally in a sunk cost task.
    Yáñez N; Bouzas A; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():47-52. PubMed ID: 28396146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Providing a reinforcement history that reduces the sunk cost effect.
    Macaskill AC; Hackenberg TD
    Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 22108673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The essential value of the alternatives of the suboptimal choice procedure is different for pigeons and rats.
    López-Tolsa GE; Niño JM; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104245. PubMed ID: 32991942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A good time to leave?: the sunk time effect in pigeons.
    Magalhães P; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jun; 105():1-5. PubMed ID: 24565982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal and nonoptimal choice in a laboratory-based sunk cost task with humans: a cross-species replication.
    Macaskill AC; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Nov; 100(3):301-15. PubMed ID: 24590698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy.
    Tait V; Miller HL
    Int J Psychol Res (Medellin); 2019; 12(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 32612790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sunk costs, psychological symptomology, and help seeking.
    Jarmolowicz DP; Bickel WK; Sofis MJ; Hatz LE; Mueller ET
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1699. PubMed ID: 27757371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do pigeons prefer alternatives that include near-hit outcomes?
    Stagner JP; Case JP; Sticklen MF; Duncan AK; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 26167775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failure to find a distance effect in pigeon choice.
    Bell MC; Sanabria F
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28542842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sub-Optimal Choice by Pigeons: Failure to Support The Allais Paradox.
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    Learn Motiv; 2011 Aug; 42(3):245-254. PubMed ID: 21852887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.