These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27014177)

  • 1. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.
    Anton KF; Gould L; Borowsky R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):623-44. PubMed ID: 24294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidental memory for colour word associates processed in colour naming and reading aloud tasks: is a blue
    Cortese MJ; Khanna MM; Von Nordheim D
    Memory; 2019 Aug; 27(7):924-930. PubMed ID: 31021306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Reverse Stroop Task with Mouse Tracking.
    Yamamoto N; Incera S; McLennan CT
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():670. PubMed ID: 27199881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Oct; 74(10):1657-1668. PubMed ID: 34190618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 32150437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stroop process dissociations: the relationship between facilitation and interference.
    Lindsay DS; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 8189189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.
    Kinoshita S; De Wit B; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):369-384. PubMed ID: 27656873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.
    Spinelli G; Krishna K; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2007-2033. PubMed ID: 32658541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroop-like serial position effects in color naming of words and nonwords.
    Marmurek HH; Proctor C; Javor A
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 16909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Onset complexity and task conflict in the Stroop task.
    Parris BA; Hasshim N; Ferrand L; Augustinova M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Dec; ():17470218231214515. PubMed ID: 37926839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.
    Risko EF; Schmidt JR; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 16893000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Role of Visual Stimuli in Cross-Modal Stroop Interference.
    Lutfi-Proctor DA; Elliott EM; Cowan N
    Psych J; 2014 Mar; 3(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 25068037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can contingency learning alone account for item-specific control? Evidence from within- and between-language ISPC effects.
    Atalay NB; Misirlisoy M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1578-90. PubMed ID: 22563632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.