These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27015214)
1. Piezosurgery for the Lingual Split Technique in Lingual Positioned Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Removal: A Retrospective Study. Ge J; Yang C; Zheng J; Qian W Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(12):e3192. PubMed ID: 27015214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extraction of a deeply impacted lower third molar by sagittal split osteotomy. Sencimen M; Varol A; Gülses A; Altug HA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):e36-8. PubMed ID: 19836712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Four osteotomy methods with piezosurgery to remove complicated mandibular third molars: a retrospective study. Ge J; Yang C; Zheng JW; He DM; Zheng LY; Hu YK J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 72(11):2126-33. PubMed ID: 25201232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Piezosurgery for the lingual split technique in mandibular third molar removal: a suggestion. Pippi R; Alvaro R J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):531-3. PubMed ID: 23524734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative analysis of postoperative morbidity and alveolar bone regeneration following surgical extraction of ımpacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and conventional ınstruments: a split-mouth clinical ınvestigation. Erdem MK; Cambazoglu M Eur J Med Res; 2024 Sep; 29(1):460. PubMed ID: 39272144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction. Basheer SA; Govind RJ; Daniel A; Sam G; Adarsh VJ; Rao A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jan; 18(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 28050988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal. Mantovani E; Arduino PG; Schierano G; Ferrero L; Gallesio G; Mozzati M; Russo A; Scully C; Carossa S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1890-7. PubMed ID: 25234524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of clinical parameters and environmental noise levels between regular surgery and piezosurgery for extraction of impacted third molars. Chang HH; Lee MS; Hsu YC; Tsai SJ; Lin CP J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Oct; 114(10):929-35. PubMed ID: 24661578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified lingual split technique versus conventional buccal technique in odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. Hindy AM; Ismaiel ME; Fayed N Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr; 41(2):1137-44. PubMed ID: 9497650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Buccal corticotomy using piezosurgery as a surgical approach for removal of deeply impacted mandibular teeth: An alternative procedure to avoid pitfalls associated with the conventional technique. Scolozzi P J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 123(2):142-146. PubMed ID: 33930598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Jiang Q; Qiu Y; Yang C; Yang J; Chen M; Zhang Z Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Oct; 94(41):e1685. PubMed ID: 26469902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of immediate post-extraction socket irrigation on development of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar removal: a prospective split-mouth study, preliminary report. Tolstunov L Br Dent J; 2012 Dec; 213(12):597-601. PubMed ID: 23257808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions? Piersanti L; Dilorenzo M; Monaco G; Marchetti C J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1647-52. PubMed ID: 25109581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth. Coulthard P; Bailey E; Esposito M; Furness S; Renton TF; Worthington HV Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD004345. PubMed ID: 25069437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin and piezosurgery on impacted mandibular third molar surgery outcomes. Uyanık LO; Bilginaylar K; Etikan İ Head Face Med; 2015 Jul; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26209242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of the technique of piezoelectric corticotomy for orthodontic traction of impacted mandibular third molars. Ma Z; Xu G; Yang C; Xie Q; Shen Y; Zhang S Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 25638568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of piezosurgery and chisel osteotomy in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars]. Gao Y; Jiang A; Li B; Yang L Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 29(4):372-4. PubMed ID: 21932656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of morbidity following the removal of mandibular third molar by lingual split, surgical bur and simplified split bone technique. Praveen G; Rajesh P; Neelakandan RS; Nandagopal CM Indian J Dent Res; 2007; 18(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 17347539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal of impacted mandibular third molars using an inward fragmentation technique (IFT) - Method and first results. Engelke W; Beltrán V; Cantín M; Choi EJ; Navarro P; Fuentes R J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 23850159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery. Menziletoglu D; Basturk F; Isik BK; Esen A Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 24(1):51-55. PubMed ID: 31811604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]