672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27016276)
1. Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.
Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Arani A; Lake DS; Glaser KJ; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 27016276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac MR elastography using reduced-FOV, single-shot, spin-echo EPI.
Sui Y; Arunachalam SP; Arani A; Trzasko JD; Young PM; Glockner JF; Glaser KJ; Lake DS; McGee KP; Manduca A; Rossman PJ; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jul; 80(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 29194738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute pressure changes in the brain are correlated with MR elastography stiffness measurements: initial feasibility in an in vivo large animal model.
Arani A; Min HK; Fattahi N; Wetjen NM; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; Jack CR; Lee KH; Ehman RL; Huston J
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):1043-1051. PubMed ID: 28488326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo, high-frequency three-dimensional cardiac MR elastography: Feasibility in normal volunteers.
Arani A; Glaser KL; Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Lake DS; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jan; 77(1):351-360. PubMed ID: 26778442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regional assessment of in vivo myocardial stiffness using 3D magnetic resonance elastography in a porcine model of myocardial infarction.
Arunachalam SP; Arani A; Baffour F; Rysavy JA; Rossman PJ; Glaser KJ; Lake DS; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):361-369. PubMed ID: 28382658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo wideband multifrequency MR elastography of the human brain and liver.
Dittmann F; Hirsch S; Tzschätzsch H; Guo J; Braun J; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1116-26. PubMed ID: 26485494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous magnetic resonance and optical elastography acquisitions: Comparison of displacement images and shear modulus estimations using a single vibration source.
Brinker ST; Kearney SP; Royston TJ; Klatt D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():135-144. PubMed ID: 29775815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of wave delivery methodology for brain MRE: Insights from computational simulations.
McGrath DM; Ravikumar N; Beltrachini L; Wilkinson ID; Frangi AF; Taylor ZA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):341-356. PubMed ID: 27416890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concurrent 3D acquisition of diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance elastography displacement data (DTI-MRE): Theory and in vivo application.
Yin Z; Kearney SP; Magin RL; Klatt D
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jan; 77(1):273-284. PubMed ID: 26787007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High spatial resolution compressed sensing (HSPARSE) functional MRI.
Fang Z; Van Le N; Choy M; Lee JH
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Aug; 76(2):440-55. PubMed ID: 26511101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR fingerprinting with simultaneous B1 estimation.
Buonincontri G; Sawiak SJ
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Oct; 76(4):1127-35. PubMed ID: 26509746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification and comparison of 4D-flow MRI-derived wall shear stress and MRE-derived wall stiffness of the abdominal aorta.
Kolipaka A; Illapani VS; Kalra P; Garcia J; Mo X; Markl M; White RD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Mar; 45(3):771-778. PubMed ID: 27603433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative shear wave magnetic resonance elastography: comparison to a dynamic shear material test.
Ringleb SI; Chen Q; Lake DS; Manduca A; Ehman RL; An KN
Magn Reson Med; 2005 May; 53(5):1197-201. PubMed ID: 15844144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR elastography of the liver and the spleen using a piezoelectric driver, single-shot wave-field acquisition, and multifrequency dual parameter reconstruction.
Hirsch S; Guo J; Reiter R; Papazoglou S; Kroencke T; Braun J; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Jan; 71(1):267-77. PubMed ID: 23413115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of regional aortic stiffness using MR elastography: A phantom and ex-vivo porcine aorta study.
Zhang N; Chen J; Yin M; Glaser KJ; Xu L; Ehman RL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 26597836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR elastography of the human heart: noninvasive assessment of myocardial elasticity changes by shear wave amplitude variations.
Sack I; Rump J; Elgeti T; Samani A; Braun J
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Mar; 61(3):668-77. PubMed ID: 19097236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of off-frequency sampling in magnetic resonance elastography.
Johnson CL; Chen DD; Olivero WC; Sutton BP; Georgiadis JG
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 30(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 22055750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: A study of feasibility and reproducibility using an ergonomic pillow-like passive driver.
Huang X; Chafi H; Matthews KL; Carmichael O; Li T; Miao Q; Wang S; Jia G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 59():68-76. PubMed ID: 30858002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining a reduced field of excitation with SENSE-based parallel imaging for maximum imaging efficiency.
Mooiweer R; Sbrizzi A; Raaijmakers AJE; van den Berg CAT; Luijten PR; Hoogduin H
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27633931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
