926 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27016289)
1. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review investigating psychosocial aspects of egg sharing in the United Kingdom and their potential effects on egg donation numbers.
Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Abdalla H; Thum MY
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2018 Sep; 21(3):163-173. PubMed ID: 28549399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences.
Purewal S; van den Akker OB
Hum Reprod Update; 2009; 15(5):499-515. PubMed ID: 19443709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating attitudes towards oocyte donation amongst potential donors and the general population: a systematic review.
Platts S; Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Jones B; Parikh R; Thum MY
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):169-181. PubMed ID: 30982353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V
Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
Lampic C; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recipient and donor experiences of known egg donation: implications for fertility counselling.
Martin N; Mahmoodi N; Hudson N; Jones G
J Reprod Infant Psychol; 2020 Sep; 38(4):354-366. PubMed ID: 31352803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review of sperm donors: demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation.
Van den Broeck U; Vandermeeren M; Vanderschueren D; Enzlin P; Demyttenaere K; D'Hooghe T
Hum Reprod Update; 2013; 19(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23146866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
Isaksson S; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Lampic C
Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
Yee S; Blyth E; Tsang AK
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
Söderström-Anttila V; Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Poranen AK; Sälevaara M; Suikkari AM
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation.
Laruelle C; Place I; Demeestere I; Englert Y; Delbaere A
Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 21149319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "I want us to be a normal family": Toward an understanding of the functions of anonymity among U.S. oocyte donors and recipients.
de Melo-Martín I; Rubin LR; Cholst IN
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(4):235-251. PubMed ID: 30398412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Egg donation for stem cell research: ideas of surplus and deficit in Australian IVF patients' and reproductive donors' accounts.
Waldby C; Carroll K
Sociol Health Illn; 2012 May; 34(4):513-28. PubMed ID: 21951180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review.
Kool EM; Bos AME; van der Graaf R; Fauser BCJM; Bredenoord AL
Hum Reprod Update; 2018 Sep; 24(5):615-635. PubMed ID: 29762669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Being an identity-release donor: a qualitative study exploring the motivations, experiences and future expectations of current UK egg donors.
Graham S; Jadva V; Freeman T; Ahuja K; Golombok S
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2016 Dec; 19(4):230-241. PubMed ID: 27563721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The attitudes of IVF patients treated in the Czech Republic towards informing children born after gamete donation.
Rumpikova T; Oborna I; Belaskova S; Konecna H; Rumpik D
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2018 Mar; 162(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 29213142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recipients of oocyte donation: an integrative review.
Hershberger P
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2004; 33(5):610-21. PubMed ID: 15495707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
