These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults. Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateralization of tonal and intonational pitch processing: an MEG study. Fournier R; Gussenhoven C; Jensen O; Hagoort P Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1328():79-88. PubMed ID: 20197065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults. Männel C; Friederici AD J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pitch contour matching and interactional alignment across turns: an acoustic investigation. Gorisch J; Wells B; Brown GJ Lang Speech; 2012 Mar; 55(Pt 1):57-76. PubMed ID: 22480026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volume of left Heschl's Gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. Wong PC; Warrier CM; Penhune VB; Roy AK; Sadehh A; Parrish TB; Zatorre RJ Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):828-36. PubMed ID: 17652466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the intonation of German intonation questions: the role of the prenuclear region. Petrone C; Niebuhr O Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):108-46. PubMed ID: 24754223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German. Mennen I; Schaeffler F; Docherty G J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2249-60. PubMed ID: 22423720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Issues in the study of intonation in language varieties. Warren P Lang Speech; 2005; 48(Pt 4):345-58. PubMed ID: 16715681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rethinking the frequency code: a meta-analytic review of the role of acoustic body size in communicative phenomena. Winter B; Oh GE; Hübscher I; Idemaru K; Brown L; Prieto P; Grawunder S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Dec; 376(1840):20200400. PubMed ID: 34719247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biology of human speech communication]. Hertrich I Anthropol Anz; 1991 Mar; 49(1-2):97-119. PubMed ID: 1859201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence for language-specific influence on the preference of stress patterns in infants learning an Iambic language (Hebrew). Segal O; Kishon-Rabin L J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1329-41. PubMed ID: 22361102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. Yu KM; Lam HW J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1320. PubMed ID: 25190405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The conceptual similarity of intonational tones and its effects on intertranscriber reliability. Herman R; McGory JT Lang Speech; 2002 Mar; 45(Pt 1):1-36. PubMed ID: 12375817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phonetic tone signals phonological quantity and word structure. Vainio M; Järvikivi J; Aalto D; Suni A J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 20815466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]