BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27017012)

  • 1. Feasibility of a Chest-worn accelerometer for physical activity measurement.
    Zhang JH; Macfarlane DJ; Sobko T
    J Sci Med Sport; 2016 Dec; 19(12):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 27017012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
    Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of accelerometer wear location on the relationship between step counts and arterial stiffness in adults treated for hypertension and diabetes.
    Cooke AB; Daskalopoulou SS; Dasgupta K
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Apr; 21(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 28855085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
    Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites.
    Tudor-Locke C; Barreira TV; Schuna JM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):839-42. PubMed ID: 25121517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
    Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of physical activity assessed using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers.
    Kamada M; Shiroma EJ; Harris TB; Lee IM
    Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():23-8. PubMed ID: 27004628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison Between Wrist-Worn and Waist-Worn Accelerometry.
    Loprinzi PD; Smith B
    J Phys Act Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):539-545. PubMed ID: 28290761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do wearable fitness devices correlate with performance-based tests of work-related functional capacity?
    Karpman J; Gross DP; Manns P; Tomkins-Lane C
    Work; 2020; 66(1):201-211. PubMed ID: 32417827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.
    Chow JJ; Thom JM; Wewege MA; Ward RE; Parmenter BJ
    Gait Posture; 2017 Sep; 57():199-203. PubMed ID: 28666177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
    Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical activity using wrist-worn accelerometers: comparison of dominant and non-dominant wrist.
    Dieu O; Mikulovic J; Fardy PS; Bui-Xuan G; Béghin L; Vanhelst J
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 26749436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of inclinometer functions of the activPAL and ActiGraph GT3X+: A focus on physical activity.
    An HS; Kim Y; Lee JM
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():174-180. PubMed ID: 27780084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.
    Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter?
    Rowlands AV; Yates T; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1935-41. PubMed ID: 27183118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Polar Active Watch and Waist- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Accelerometers for Measuring Children's Physical Activity Levels during Unstructured Afterschool Programs.
    Kim Y; Lochbaum M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30332785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.
    Rowlands AV; Rennie K; Kozarski R; Stanley RM; Eston RG; Parfitt GC; Olds TS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
    O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Forman JL; Trost SG
    J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The backwards comparability of wrist worn GENEActiv and waist worn ActiGraph accelerometer estimates of sedentary time in children.
    Boddy LM; Noonan RJ; Rowlands AV; Hurter L; Knowles ZR; Fairclough SJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2019 Jul; 22(7):814-820. PubMed ID: 30803818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
    Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
    Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.