117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27017105)
1. Experimental and numerical predictions of Biomet(®) alloplastic implant in a cadaveric mandibular ramus.
Mesnard M; Ramos A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 27017105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ex-vivo and in vitro validation of an innovative mandibular condyle implant concept.
Ramos A; Gonzalez-Perez LM; Infante-Cossio P; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):112-119. PubMed ID: 30545800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Christensen vs Biomet Microfixation alloplastic TMJ implant: Are there improvements? A numerical study.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1398-403. PubMed ID: 26300296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The stock alloplastic temporomandibular joint implant can influence the behavior of the opposite native joint: A numerical study.
Ramos AM; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1384-91. PubMed ID: 26231883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strain induced in the condyle by self-tapping screws in the Biomet alloplastic temporomandibular joint: a preliminary experimental study.
Ramos A; Duarte RJ; Mesnard M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1376-82. PubMed ID: 26194773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new condyle implant design concept for an alloplastic temporomandibular joint in bone resorption cases.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1670-1677. PubMed ID: 27569384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction at long-term condyle screw fixation of temporomandibular joint implant: A numerical study.
Ramos A; Duarte RJ; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 25819477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Load transfer in Christensen(®) TMJ in alloplastic total joint replacement for two different mouth apertures.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1442-9. PubMed ID: 24954763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Theoretical assessment of an intramedullary condylar component versus screw fixation for the condylar component of a hemiarthroplasty alloplastic TMJ replacement system.
Ramos A; Mesnard M; Relvas C; Completo A; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 42(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23684530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influences of implant condyle geometry on bone and screw strains in a temporomandibular implant.
Mesnard M; Ramos A; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 23726645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: the influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws.
Ramos A; Completo A; Relvas C; Mesnard M; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 20801667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of a condylar support prosthesis to replace the temporomandibular joint.
Abel EW; Hilgers A; McLoughlin PM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 25703687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A personalized 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint: From implant design to implantation.
Ackland DC; Robinson D; Redhead M; Lee PVS; Moskaljuk A; Dimitroulis G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 May; 69():404-411. PubMed ID: 28199931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of load transfers in TMJ replacement using a standard and a custom-made temporal component.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1766-72. PubMed ID: 25009108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of a metaphyseal sleeve on the stress-strain state of a bone-tumor implant system in the distal femur: an experimental and finite element analysis.
Li JJ; Tian DM; Yang L; Zhang JY; Hu YC
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 15(1):589. PubMed ID: 33298115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of stress distribution in resorbable screw fixation system: three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular setback surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Choi JP; Baek SH; Choi JY
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1104-9. PubMed ID: 20613578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bone adaptation after modification in biomet standard alloplastic temporomandibular joint prostheses.
Zhao J; Zou L; He D; Ellis E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1707-1711. PubMed ID: 30150011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influences of geometrical and mechanical properties of bone tissues in mandible behaviour - experimental and numerical predictions.
Ramos A; Nyashin Y; Mesnard M
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Jul; 20(9):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 28446031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental assessment of a new direct fixation implant for artificial limbs.
Tomaszewski PK; Lasnier B; Hannink G; Verkerke GJ; Verdonschot N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():77-85. PubMed ID: 23510969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
