757 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27017269)
1. Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant.
Van Stappen F; Mathot M; Decruyenaere V; Loriers A; Delcour A; Planchon V; Goffart JP; Stilmant D
J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():20-32. PubMed ID: 27017269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental assessment of energy generation from agricultural and farm waste through anaerobic digestion.
Nayal FS; Mammadov A; Ciliz N
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 2):389-399. PubMed ID: 27742149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment.
Styles D; Dominguez EM; Chadwick D
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():241-53. PubMed ID: 27101461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.
Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental consequences of processing manure to produce mineral fertilizer and bio-energy.
De Vries JW; Groenestein CM; De Boer IJ
J Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 102():173-83. PubMed ID: 22459014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy.
Riva C; Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24841069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Life cycle assessment of flexibly fed biogas processes for an improved demand-oriented biogas supply.
Ertem FC; Martínez-Blanco J; Finkbeiner M; Neubauer P; Junne S
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 219():536-544. PubMed ID: 27522120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dry anaerobic digestion of cow manure and agricultural products in a full-scale plant: Efficiency and comparison with wet fermentation.
Chiumenti A; da Borso F; Limina S
Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():704-710. PubMed ID: 28389052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Green cheese: partial life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and energy intensity of integrated dairy production and bioenergy systems.
Aguirre-Villegas HA; Passos-Fonseca TH; Reinemann DJ; Armentano LE; Wattiaux MA; Cabrera VE; Norman JM; Larson R
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1571-92. PubMed ID: 25597974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A highly concentrated diet increases biogas production and the agronomic value of young bull's manure.
Mendonça Costa MSS; Lucas J; Mendonça Costa LA; Orrico ACA
Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():521-527. PubMed ID: 26452426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the influence of energy density and feedstock transport distance on the environmental performance of methane from maize silages.
Bacenetti J; Lovarelli D; Ingrao C; Tricase C; Negri M; Fiala M
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Oct; 193():256-65. PubMed ID: 26141286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The survival of pathogenic bacteria and plant growth promoting bacteria during mesophilic anaerobic digestion in full-scale biogas plants.
Qi G; Pan Z; Yamamoto Y; Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ; Yamashiro T; Iwasaki M; Ihara I; Tangtaweewipat S; Umetsu K
Anim Sci J; 2019 Feb; 90(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 30554439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anaerobic co-digestion of recalcitrant agricultural wastes: Characterizing of biochemical parameters of digestate and its impacts on soil ecosystem.
Muscolo A; Settineri G; Papalia T; Attinà E; Basile C; Panuccio MR
Sci Total Environ; 2017 May; 586():746-752. PubMed ID: 28214122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of biogas production in Argentina from co-digestion of sludge and municipal solid waste.
Morero B; Vicentin R; Campanella EA
Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():195-205. PubMed ID: 27955887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental and economic analysis of power generation in a thermophilic biogas plant.
Ruiz D; San Miguel G; Corona B; Gaitero A; Domínguez A
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 633():1418-1428. PubMed ID: 29758894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products--are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?
Meier MS; Stoessel F; Jungbluth N; Juraske R; Schader C; Stolze M
J Environ Manage; 2015 Feb; 149():193-208. PubMed ID: 25463583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Horse manure as feedstock for anaerobic digestion.
Hadin S; Eriksson O
Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():506-18. PubMed ID: 27396682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Life-cycle assessment of sewage sludge-based large-scale biogas plant.
Singh AD; Upadhyay A; Shrivastava S; Vivekanand V
Bioresour Technol; 2020 Aug; 309():123373. PubMed ID: 32305838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
