These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27017411)

  • 21. The Eriksen flanker effect revisited.
    Sanders AF; Lamers JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Jan; 109(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11766139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional adjustment to conflict strength: evidence from the effects of manipulating flanker-target SOA on response times and prestimulus pupil size.
    Wendt M; Kiesel A; Geringswald F; Purmann S; Fischer R
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 24149239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Action selection conflict and intentional binding: An ERP study.
    Vastano R; Ambrosini E; Ulloa JL; Brass M
    Cortex; 2020 May; 126():182-199. PubMed ID: 32088407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An online neural substrate for sense of agency.
    Chambon V; Wenke D; Fleming SM; Prinz W; Haggard P
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 May; 23(5):1031-7. PubMed ID: 22510529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uncovering effects of self-control and stimulus-driven action selection on the sense of agency.
    Wang Y; Damen TGE; Aarts H
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Oct; 55():245-253. PubMed ID: 28942359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Action Choice and Outcome Congruency Independently Affect Intentional Binding and Feeling of Control Judgments.
    Barlas Z; Kopp S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():137. PubMed ID: 29695958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modulating the sense of agency with external cues.
    Moore JW; Wegner DM; Haggard P
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):1056-64. PubMed ID: 19515577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?
    Chambon V; Sidarus N; Haggard P
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():320. PubMed ID: 24860486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict.
    Zmigrod S; Zmigrod L; Hommel B
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():320-5. PubMed ID: 26924018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of inverting natural stimuli in a flanker task.
    Wells IC; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19271814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of performance on action-effect integration in sense of agency.
    Wen W; Yamashita A; Asama H
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():89-98. PubMed ID: 28651095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sense of agency in continuous action is influenced by outcome feedback in one-back trials.
    Oishi H; Tanaka K; Watanabe K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102897. PubMed ID: 31365896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does conflict control occur without awareness? Evidence from an ERP study.
    Wang B; Xiang L; Li J
    Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 1490():161-9. PubMed ID: 23123206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. I control therefore I do: judgments of agency influence action selection.
    Karsh N; Eitam B
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():122-31. PubMed ID: 25724007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Violation of expectations about movement and goal achievement leads to Sense of Agency reduction.
    Villa R; Tidoni E; Porciello G; Aglioti SM
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):2123-2135. PubMed ID: 29767295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Try and try again: Post-error boost of an implicit measure of agency.
    Di Costa S; Théro H; Chambon V; Haggard P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1584-1595. PubMed ID: 28697690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. It Was Me: The Use of Sense of Agency Cues Differs Between Cultures.
    Bart VKE; Sharavdorj E; Bazarvaani K; Munkhbat T; Wenke D; Rieger M
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():650. PubMed ID: 30967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI.
    Spengler S; von Cramon DY; Brass M
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):290-8. PubMed ID: 19457378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Opposing influences on conflict-driven adaptation in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Bugg JM
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1217-27. PubMed ID: 18927038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anticipating conflict facilitates controlled stimulus-response selection.
    Correa A; Rao A; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1461-72. PubMed ID: 18823248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.