150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27017685)
1. Keeping watch: U.S. Supreme Court rulings.
Am Nurse; 2016; 48(1):4. PubMed ID: 27017685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coming full circle: a reflection on the Supreme Court's decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
Toti S
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):439-440. PubMed ID: 27639929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do not mess with Texas: A landmark victory for abortion access and the road ahead.
Kumar B
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):445-446. PubMed ID: 27639931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Will rejecting woman-protective justifications for antiabortion laws increase harassment and violence?
Cohen DS
Contraception; 2016 Nov; 94(5):441-444. PubMed ID: 27639930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Supreme court vs nurses--an unacceptable decision.
Calfee BE
Revolution; 1994; 4(3):12-5, 17, 104. PubMed ID: 7788042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. US Supreme Court expected to weaken abortion rights.
Jaffe S
Lancet; 2021 Dec; 398(10317):2137-2138. PubMed ID: 34895521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Darney PD; Rosenfield A
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):226-7. PubMed ID: 17666593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Violence against women and the U.S. Supreme Court: recent challenges and opportunities for advocates and practitioners.
Rutkow L; Vernick JS; Webster DW; Lennig DJ
Violence Against Women; 2009 Oct; 15(10):1248-58. PubMed ID: 19762719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Richman S
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Voutsos LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court excludes nurses with responsibilities for overseeing other staff from protections of labor law.
Frank G
J Emerg Nurs; 2001 Dec; 27(6):581-2. PubMed ID: 11712015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. U.S. Court in New York rejects partial-birth abortion ban.
Preston J
N Y Times Web; 2004 Aug; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15540363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President.
Battaglia F
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1169; author reply 1170. PubMed ID: 17978133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. AFT to organize nurses.
Barton SR
Health Care Week; 1978 Dec; 2(23):1, 10. PubMed ID: 10239283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How much damage did Supreme Court ruling do to health care unionization?
Levin-Epstein M
Manag Care; 2001 Aug; 10(8):16, 18. PubMed ID: 11565377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How Will Recent Abortion Legislation Affect Women's Health?
Zolot J
Am J Nurs; 2019 Aug; 119(8):15. PubMed ID: 31356314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court rejects longstanding labor rule for nurses. NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America.
Mahoney ME
Health Care Superv; 1995 Jun; 13(4):13-7. PubMed ID: 10184342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women.
Weitz TA; Fogel SB
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe versus reality--abortion and women's health.
Wright AA; Katz IT
N Engl J Med; 2006 Jul; 355(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16822990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
