These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2701823)

  • 1. The effectiveness of EMG biofeedback in the treatment of arm function after stroke.
    Crow JL; Lincoln NB; Nouri FM; De Weerdt W
    Int Disabil Stud; 1989; 11(4):155-60. PubMed ID: 2701823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis.
    Moreland J; Thomson MA
    Phys Ther; 1994 Jun; 74(6):534-43; discussion 544-7. PubMed ID: 8197240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electromyographic biofeedback for gait training after stroke.
    Bradley L; Hart BB; Mandana S; Flowers K; Riches M; Sanderson P
    Clin Rehabil; 1998 Feb; 12(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 9549021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke.
    Parry RH; Lincoln NB; Vass CD
    Clin Rehabil; 1999 Jun; 13(3):187-98. PubMed ID: 10392645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status.
    Wolf SL; Binder-MacLeod SA
    Phys Ther; 1983 Sep; 63(9):1393-403. PubMed ID: 6611660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: a meta-analysis.
    Moreland JD; Thomson MA; Fuoco AR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Feb; 79(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 9473993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of EMG feedback on paretic muscles and abnormal co-contraction in the hemiplegic arm, compared with conventional physical therapy.
    Prevo AJ; Visser SL; Vogelaar TW
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1982; 14(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 7134912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EMG biofeedback in stroke: effect of patient characteristics.
    Wolf SL; Baker MP; Kelly JL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1979 Mar; 60(3):96-102. PubMed ID: 485806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke.
    Lincoln NB; Parry RH; Vass CD
    Stroke; 1999 Mar; 30(3):573-9. PubMed ID: 10066854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in lower extremity neuromuscular and functional status.
    Wolf SL; Binder-MacLeod SA
    Phys Ther; 1983 Sep; 63(9):1404-13. PubMed ID: 6611661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke.
    Gowland C; deBruin H; Basmajian JV; Plews N; Burcea I
    Phys Ther; 1992 Sep; 72(9):624-33. PubMed ID: 1508970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EMG biofeedback in stroke: a 1-year follow-up on the effect of patient characteristics.
    Wolf SL; Baker MP; Kelly JL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 Aug; 61(8):351-5. PubMed ID: 7406672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rehabilitation of walking with electromyographic biofeedback in foot-drop after stroke.
    Intiso D; Santilli V; Grasso MG; Rossi R; Caruso I
    Stroke; 1994 Jun; 25(6):1189-92. PubMed ID: 8202978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electromyographic feedback in the remobilization of stroke patients: a controlled trial.
    Burnside IG; Tobias HS; Bursill D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1982 May; 63(5):217-22. PubMed ID: 7041850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase.
    Hemmen B; Seelen HA
    Clin Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 21(7):587-94. PubMed ID: 17702700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients. A critical review.
    Wolf SL
    Phys Ther; 1983 Sep; 63(9):1448-59. PubMed ID: 6351119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of severe hand impairment following stroke by combining assisted movement, muscle vibration, and biofeedback.
    Cordo P; Wolf S; Lou JS; Bogey R; Stevenson M; Hayes J; Roth E
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2013 Dec; 37(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 24232364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial.
    Sunderland A; Tinson DJ; Bradley EL; Fletcher D; Langton Hewer R; Wade DT
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 55(7):530-5. PubMed ID: 1640226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A meta-analysis of EMG biofeedback treatment of temporomandibular disorders.
    Crider AB; Glaros AG
    J Orofac Pain; 1999; 13(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 10425966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb.
    Inglis J; Donald MW; Monga TN; Sproule M; Young MJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Dec; 65(12):755-9. PubMed ID: 6391417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.