155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27018669)
1. Current Trends and Controversies in Breast Augmentation.
Hidalgo DA; Sinno S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1142-1150. PubMed ID: 27018669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.
Gurunluoglu R; Gurunluoglu A; Williams SA; Tebockhorst S
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 21862916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of career stage, practice type and location, and physician's sex on surgical practices among board-certified plastic surgeons performing breast augmentation.
Naidu NS; Patrick PA
Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Nov; 31(8):941-52. PubMed ID: 22065884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative assessment preferences and reported reoperation rates for size change in primary breast augmentation: a survey of ASPS members.
Choudry U; Kim N
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Dec; 130(6):1352-1359. PubMed ID: 23190819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current Trends in Breast Augmentation: An International Analysis.
Heidekrueger PI; Sinno S; Hidalgo DA; Colombo M; Broer PN
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):133-148. PubMed ID: 28591762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practice Patterns in Breast Augmentation: A National Survey of Current Practice.
Chopra K; Gowda AU; McNichols CHL; Brown EN; Slezak S; Rasko Y
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6):629-632. PubMed ID: 27922894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preferences in choosing between breast reconstruction options: a survey of female plastic surgeons.
Sbitany H; Amalfi AN; Langstein HN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Dec; 124(6):1781-1789. PubMed ID: 19952634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary breast augmentation today: a survey of current breast augmentation practice patterns.
Reece EM; Ghavami A; Hoxworth RE; Alvarez SA; Hatef DA; Brown S; Rohrich RJ
Aesthet Surg J; 2009; 29(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19371842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How Breast Implant Surface Type Is Influenced by Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Carr LW; Roberts J; Potochny JD
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 82(4S Suppl 3):S208-S211. PubMed ID: 30855390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preventing Breast Implant Contamination in Breast Reconstruction: A National Survey of Current Practice.
Gowda AU; Chopra K; Brown EN; Slezak S; Rasko Y
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Feb; 78(2):153-156. PubMed ID: 27464530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Implant Imaging Surveillance among U.S. Plastic Surgeons: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Recommendations versus Clinical Reality.
Carr LW; Roberts J; Mericli AF; Liu J; Arribas EM; Clemens MW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 145(6):1381-1387. PubMed ID: 32459768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oncoplastic techniques: Attitudes and changing practice amongst breast and plastic surgeons in Great Britain.
Challoner T; Skillman J; Wallis K; Vourvachis M; Whisker L; Hardwicke J
Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():58-64. PubMed ID: 28505558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recurrence of subglandular breast implant capsular contracture: anterior versus total capsulectomy.
Collis N; Sharpe DT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(4):792-7. PubMed ID: 11007390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery.
Spear SL; Sher SR; Al-Attar A; Pittman T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jan; 133(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24105085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer screening prior to cosmetic breast surgery: ASPS members' Adherence to American Cancer Society Guidelines.
Selber JC; Nelson JA; Ashana AO; Bergey MR; Bristol MN; Sonnad SS; Serletti JM; Wu LC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Nov; 124(5):1375-1385. PubMed ID: 20009821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Textured or smooth implants for submuscular breast augmentation: a controlled study.
Asplund O; Gylbert L; Jurell G; Ward C
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 May; 97(6):1200-6. PubMed ID: 8628802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes.
Spear SL; Carter ME; Ganz JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 12900603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes toward biological mesh in breast reconstruction: a regional survey of plastic surgeons.
Rezak KM; Gillette K; Samson MC; Newman MI
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):92e-93e. PubMed ID: 20679802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast reduction trend among plastic surgeons: a national survey.
Okoro SA; Barone C; Bohnenblust M; Wang HT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Nov; 122(5):1312-1320. PubMed ID: 18971713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience.
Salzberg CA; Ashikari AY; Berry C; Hunsicker LM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug; 138(2):329-337. PubMed ID: 27064232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
