These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27019021)

  • 1. Meta-analysis to integrate effect sizes within an article: Possible misuse and Type I error inflation.
    Ueno T; Fastrich GM; Murayama K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 May; 145(5):643-654. PubMed ID: 27019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Synthesizing single-case studies: a Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model.
    Owens CM; Ferron JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 22180105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods.
    Field AP
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Jun; 6(2):161-80. PubMed ID: 11411440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capturing the underlying distribution in meta-analysis: Credibility and tolerance intervals.
    Brannick MT; French KA; Rothstein HR; Kiselica AM; Apostoloski N
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):264-290. PubMed ID: 33543583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
    Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A methodological review of meta-analyses of the effectiveness of clinical psychology treatments.
    Rubio-Aparicio M; Marín-Martínez F; Sánchez-Meca J; López-López JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):2057-2073. PubMed ID: 29052165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: attempted replication and extension of Field's (2001) simulation studies.
    Hafdahl AR; Williams MA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 19271846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing the logic of replication: A case from infant studies.
    Margoni F; Shepperd M
    Infant Behav Dev; 2020 Nov; 61():101483. PubMed ID: 33011611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutions.
    Schuit E; Roes KC; Mol BW; Kwee A; Moons KG; Groenwold RH
    Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 4():57. PubMed ID: 25908184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.