These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27019021)

  • 21. Accuracy of effect size estimates from published psychological experiments involving multiple trials.
    Brand A; Bradley MT; Best LA; Stoica G
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(4):281-91. PubMed ID: 24836566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1515-1539. PubMed ID: 28936638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Meta-Meta-Analysis: Empirical Review of Statistical Power, Type I Error Rates, Effect Sizes, and Model Selection of Meta-Analyses Published in Psychology.
    Cafri G; Kromrey JD; Brannick MT
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Mar; 45(2):239-70. PubMed ID: 26760285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Synthesizer 1.0: a varying-coefficient meta-analytic tool.
    Krizan Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 20805608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Monte Carlo evaluation of tests for comparing dependent correlations.
    Hittner JB; May K; Silver NC
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 12773018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?
    Field AP
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):444-67. PubMed ID: 16392999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.
    Maassen E; van Assen MALM; Nuijten MB; Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233107. PubMed ID: 32459806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accounting for uncertainty due to 'last observation carried forward' outcome imputation in a meta-analysis model.
    Dimitrakopoulou V; Efthimiou O; Leucht S; Salanti G
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):742-52. PubMed ID: 25492741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of meta-analytic statistical significance testing.
    Polanin JR; Pigott TD
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Mar; 6(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 26035470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Editorial.
    Albarracín D; Cuijpers P; Eastwick PW; Johnson BT; Roisman GI; Sinatra GM; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Mar; 144(3):223-226. PubMed ID: 29553772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing meta-analytic moderator estimation techniques under realistic conditions.
    Steel PD; Kammeyer-Mueller JD
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Feb; 87(1):96-111. PubMed ID: 11916220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Chacón-Moscoso S
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):448-67. PubMed ID: 14664682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Random-effects meta-analysis of correlations: Monte Carlo evaluation of mean estimators.
    Hafdahl AR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):227-54. PubMed ID: 19527563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parameter accuracy in meta-analyses of factor structures.
    Gnambs T; Staufenbiel T
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):168-86. PubMed ID: 27286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. More Voodoo correlations: when average-based measures inflate correlations.
    Brand A; Bradley MT
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(4):260-72. PubMed ID: 24837177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How meta-analysis increases statistical power.
    Cohn LD; Becker BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Sep; 8(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 14596489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2465-77. PubMed ID: 12205693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.