These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27019277)

  • 1. A Missing Data Approach to Correct for Direct and Indirect Range Restrictions with a Dichotomous Criterion: A Simulation Study.
    Pfaffel A; Kollmayer M; Schober B; Spiel C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152330. PubMed ID: 27019277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting the predictive validity of a selection test for the effect of indirect range restriction.
    Zimmermann S; Klusmann D; Hampe W
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 17(1):246. PubMed ID: 29228995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who r u?: On the (in)accuracy of incumbent-based estimates of range restriction in criterion-related and differential validity research.
    Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Robbins SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):802-828. PubMed ID: 28150987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Multiple imputation of missing at random data: General points and presentation of a Monte-Carlo method].
    Cottrell G; Cot M; Mary JY
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2009 Oct; 57(5):361-72. PubMed ID: 19674855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variable selection in the presence of missing data: resampling and imputation.
    Long Q; Johnson BA
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jul; 16(3):596-610. PubMed ID: 25694614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Improved Correction for Range Restricted Correlations Under Extreme, Monotonic Quadratic Nonlinearity and Heteroscedasticity.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):550-64. PubMed ID: 25953477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Missing value imputation in high-dimensional phenomic data: imputable or not, and how?
    Liao SG; Lin Y; Kang DD; Chandra D; Bon J; Kaminski N; Sciurba FC; Tseng GC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):346. PubMed ID: 25371041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential imputation for missing values.
    Verboven S; Branden KV; Goos P
    Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Oct; 31(5-6):320-7. PubMed ID: 17920334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
    Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple imputation for non-response when estimating HIV prevalence using survey data.
    Chinomona A; Mwambi H
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Oct; 15():1059. PubMed ID: 26475303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the generalizability of indirect range restriction corrections.
    Beatty AS; Barratt CL; Berry CM; Sackett PR
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Jul; 99(4):587-98. PubMed ID: 24661276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing data and imputation: a practical illustration in a prognostic study on low back pain.
    Vergouw D; Heymans MW; van der Windt DA; Foster NE; Dunn KM; van der Horst HE; de Vet HC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jul; 35(6):464-71. PubMed ID: 22964020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.
    Groenwold RH; Donders AR; Roes KC; Harrell FE; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22262640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian analysis for generalized linear models with nonignorably missing covariates.
    Huang L; Chen MH; Ibrahim JG
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):767-80. PubMed ID: 16135028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in longitudinal data in the presence of a time-varying covariate with a non-linear association with time: a simulation study.
    De Silva AP; Moreno-Betancur M; De Livera AM; Lee KJ; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 28743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model selection of generalized estimating equations with multiply imputed longitudinal data.
    Shen CW; Chen YH
    Biom J; 2013 Nov; 55(6):899-911. PubMed ID: 23970494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying reprioritization response shift in a stroke caregiver population: a comparison of missing data methods.
    Sajobi TT; Lix LM; Singh G; Lowerison M; Engbers J; Mayo NE
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Mar; 24(3):529-40. PubMed ID: 25344817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple imputation in veterinary epidemiological studies: a case study and simulation.
    Dohoo IR; Nielsen CR; Emanuelson U
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jul; 129():35-47. PubMed ID: 27317321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.