309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27020004)
1. Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.
Lewiecki EM; Binkley N; Morgan SL; Shuhart CR; Camargos BM; Carey JJ; Gordon CM; Jankowski LG; Lee JK; Leslie WD;
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):127-40. PubMed ID: 27020004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.
Morgan SL; Prater GL
Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():13-28. PubMed ID: 28159711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DXA Errors Are Common and Reduced by Use of a Reporting Template.
Krueger D; Shives E; Siglinsky E; Libber J; Buehring B; Hansen KE; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(1):115-124. PubMed ID: 30327243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DXA quality matters.
Lewiecki EM; Binkley N; Petak SM
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 17097522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE QUALITY OF DXA SCANS AND REPORTS.
Licata AA; Binkley N; Petak SM; Camacho PM
Endocr Pract; 2018 Feb; 24(2):220-229. PubMed ID: 29466058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis.
Lewiecki EM
Minerva Med; 2005 Oct; 96(5):317-30. PubMed ID: 16227947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing.
Lewiecki EM; Lane NE
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Dec; 4(12):667-74. PubMed ID: 18936788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study.
Karahan AY; Kaya B; Kuran B; Altındag O; Yildirim P; Dogan SC; Basaran A; Salbas E; Altınbilek T; Guler T; Tolu S; Hasbek Z; Ordahan B; Kaydok E; Yucel U; Yesilyurt S; Polat AD; Cubukcu M; Nas O; Sarp U; Yasar O; Kucuksarac S; Turkoglu G; Karadag A; Bagcaci S; Erol K; Guler E; Tuna S; Yildirim A; Karpuz S
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2016; 59(4):117-123. PubMed ID: 28440214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing DXA to Assess Skeletal Health: Key Concepts for Clinicians.
Kennel KA; Sfeir JG; Drake MT
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2020 Dec; 105(12):. PubMed ID: 32894765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry and pitfalls in the assessment of osteoporosis: a primer for the practicing clinician.
Wong CP; Gani LU; Chong LR
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Aug; 15(1):135. PubMed ID: 32833113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Watts NB
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Nov; 15(11):847-54. PubMed ID: 15322740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of DXA for monitoring, technical aspects of DXA BMD measurement and precision testing.
Carey JJ; Delaney MF
Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():44-53. PubMed ID: 28554549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling.
Bolotin HH
Bone; 2007 Jul; 41(1):138-54. PubMed ID: 17481978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeating Measurement of Bone Mineral Density when Monitoring with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: 2019 ISCD Official Position.
Kendler DL; Compston J; Carey JJ; Wu CH; Ibrahim A; Lewiecki EM
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(4):489-500. PubMed ID: 31378452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?
Celi M; Rao C; Scialdoni A; Tempesta V; Gasbarra E; Pistillo P; Tarantino U
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2013 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S47-9. PubMed ID: 24046042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone densitometry worldwide: a global survey by the ISCD and IOF.
Clynes MA; Westbury LD; Dennison EM; Kanis JA; Javaid MK; Harvey NC; Fujita M; Cooper C; Leslie WD; Shuhart CR;
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1779-1786. PubMed ID: 32377806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention and management of osteoporosis: consensus statements from the Scientific Advisory Board of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2. The use of bone density measurement in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.
Sturtridge W; Lentle B; Hanley DA
CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(7):924-9. PubMed ID: 8837541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan autoanalysis vs manual analysis.
Baniak N; Grzybowski S; Olszynski WP
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 24176429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intervals between bone mineral density testing with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in clinical practice.
Lyu H; Yoshida K; Tedeschi SK; Zhao S; Xu C; Nigwekar SU; Leder BZ; Solomon DH
Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):923-927. PubMed ID: 30680429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
