These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27020137)

  • 61. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Pickett EJ; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1132-48. PubMed ID: 27036250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Musicians and the metric structure of words.
    Marie C; Magne C; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):294-305. PubMed ID: 20044890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Speech perception in a second language: Hearing is believing-seeing is not.
    Ma F; Ai H; Xiao T; Guo T; Pae HK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jun; 73(6):881-890. PubMed ID: 32075498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.
    Dave S; Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1768():147573. PubMed ID: 34216583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.
    Jin P; Lu Y; Ding N
    Elife; 2020 Apr; 9():. PubMed ID: 32310082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Not all disfluencies are are equal: The effects of disfluent repetitions on language comprehension.
    MacGregor LJ; Corley M; Donaldson DI
    Brain Lang; 2009 Oct; 111(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 19700188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition.
    Cai ZG; Gilbert RA; Davis MH; Gaskell MG; Farrar L; Adler S; Rodd JM
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Nov; 98():73-101. PubMed ID: 28881224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The bilingual brain turns a blind eye to negative statements in the second language.
    Jończyk R; Boutonnet B; Musiał K; Hoemann K; Thierry G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):527-40. PubMed ID: 26926623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The interaction of lexical tone, intonation and semantic context in on-line spoken word recognition: an ERP study on Cantonese Chinese.
    Kung C; Chwilla DJ; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():293-309. PubMed ID: 24315803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. What's in a pause: event-related potential analysis of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences.
    Besson M; Faita F; Czternasty C; Kutas M
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun; 46(1):3-23. PubMed ID: 9255429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.
    Strori D; Bradlow AR; Souza PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3765. PubMed ID: 32611135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech.
    Munro MJ; Derwing TM
    Lang Speech; 1995; 38 ( Pt 3)():289-306. PubMed ID: 8816082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effects of noise and speech intelligibility on listener comprehension and processing time of Korean-accented English.
    Wilson EO; Spaulding TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20699339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Sins of omission are more likely to be forgiven in non-native speakers.
    Fairchild S; Papafragou A
    Cognition; 2018 Dec; 181():80-92. PubMed ID: 30149264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study.
    Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A comparison of sentence- and discourse-level semantic processing: an ERP study.
    Salmon N; Pratt H
    Brain Lang; 2002 Dec; 83(3):367-83. PubMed ID: 12468394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Event-related potentials reveal task-dependence and inter-individual differences in negation processing during silent listening and explicit truth-value evaluation.
    Herbert C; Kissler J
    Neuroscience; 2014 Sep; 277():902-10. PubMed ID: 25088913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Separating phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study.
    D'Arcy RC; Connolly JF; Service E; Hawco CS; Houlihan ME
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 15083525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Electrophysiological correlates of semantic anticipation during speech comprehension.
    León-Cabrera P; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Morís J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():326-334. PubMed ID: 28300582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.