161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27020966)
21. Analysis of various beamlet sizes for IMRT with 6 MV photons.
Sohn JW; Dempsey JF; Suh TS; Low DA
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2432-9. PubMed ID: 14528965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Head scatter off-axis for megavoltage x rays.
Zhu TC; Bjärngard BE
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 12722805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can volumetric modulated arc therapy with flattening filter free beams play a role in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver lesions? A volume-based analysis.
Reggiori G; Mancosu P; Castiglioni S; Alongi F; Pellegrini C; Lobefalo F; Catalano M; Fogliata A; Arcangeli S; Navarria P; Cozzi L; Scorsetti M
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1112-8. PubMed ID: 22320821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation therapy with unflattened photon beams: dosimetric accuracy of advanced dose calculation algorithms.
Kragl G; Albrich D; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 21945857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monochromatic beam characterization for Auger electron dosimetry and radiotherapy.
Dugas JP; Oves SD; Sajo E; Matthews KL; Ham K; Hogstrom KR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S137-41. PubMed ID: 18599232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Equivalent-quality unflattened photon beam modeling, planning, and delivery.
Huang Y; Flynn RT; Siochi RA; Bayouth JE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4211. PubMed ID: 23835385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of initial electron beam parameters on Monte Carlo calculated absorbed dose distributions for radiotherapy photon beams.
Tzedakis A; Damilakis JE; Mazonakis M; Stratakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):907-13. PubMed ID: 15125009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of dose-delivery time for flattened and flattening filter-free photon beams based on microdosimetric kinetic model.
Nakano H; Kawahara D; Ono K; Akagi Y; Hirokawa Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206673. PubMed ID: 30462672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Monte Carlo study of photon fields from a flattening filter-free clinical accelerator.
Vassiliev ON; Titt U; Kry SF; Pönisch F; Gillin MT; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):820-7. PubMed ID: 16696457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [A Proposal for the Absorbed Dose to Water Dosimetry for Flattening Filter-free Beams].
Katayose T; Kawachi T; Miyasaka R; Kodama T; Takase N; Iriyama E; Chang W; Saitoh H
Igaku Butsuri; 2016; 36(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 28428458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetric evaluation of photon dose calculation under jaw and MLC shielding.
Fogliata A; Clivio A; Vanetti E; Nicolini G; Belosi MF; Cozzi L
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101706. PubMed ID: 24089896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Photon beam quality specification by narrow-beam transmission measurements.
Nyström H; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Aug; 39(8):1231-45. PubMed ID: 15551564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Technical Report: Evaluation of peripheral dose for flattening filter free photon beams.
Covington EL; Ritter TA; Moran JM; Owrangi AM; Prisciandaro JI
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4789. PubMed ID: 27487896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Current status and future perspective of flattening filter free photon beams.
Georg D; Knöös T; McClean B
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1280-93. PubMed ID: 21520840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison between the TRS-398 code of practice and the TG-51 dosimetry protocol for flattening filter free beams.
Lye JE; Butler DJ; Oliver CP; Alves A; Lehmann J; Gibbons FP; Williams IM
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):N362-72. PubMed ID: 27366933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose uncertainties in photon pencil kernel calculations at off-axis positions.
Olofsson J; Nyholm T; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3418-25. PubMed ID: 17022238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface and build-up dose comparison between Elekta 6 MV flattening filter and flattening-filter-free beams using an advanced Markus ionization chamber and a solid water-equivalent phantom.
Imae T; Takenaka S; Watanabe Y; Aoki A; Matsuda K; Sasaki K; Saegusa S; Nawa K; Nakagawa K; Abe O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 21(12):334-339. PubMed ID: 33184970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment-planning study of prostate cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a Varian Clinac operated without a flattening filter.
Vassiliev ON; Kry SF; Kuban DA; Salehpour M; Mohan R; Titt U
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1567-71. PubMed ID: 17544596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
