These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27021306)
21. A comparison of female versus male insanity acquittees in Colorado. Seig A; Ball E; Menninger JA Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(4):523-32. PubMed ID: 8639980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intoxication and settled insanity: a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity. Feix J; Wolber G J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 17592162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Updating toxic psychosis into 21st-century Canadian: Bouchard-Lebrun v. R. Watts J J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(3):374-81. PubMed ID: 24051590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The unconditional release of mentally ill offenders from indefinite commitment: a study of Missouri insanity acquittees. Linhorst DM J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):563-79. PubMed ID: 10638784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors associated with the conditional release of persons acquitted by reason of insanity: a decision tree approach. Callahan LA; Silver E Law Hum Behav; 1998 Apr; 22(2):147-63. PubMed ID: 9566120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors Associated with Review Board Dispositions following Re-hospitalization among Discharged Persons found Not Criminally Responsible. Wilson CM; Nicholls TL; Charette Y; Seto MC; Crocker AG Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):278-94. PubMed ID: 27041680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hospital treatment of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity. Kapoor R; Wasser TD; Funaro MC; Norko MA Behav Sci Law; 2020 Sep; 38(5):426-440. PubMed ID: 32897589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Insanity plea: predicting not guilty by reason of insanity adjudications. Jeffrey RW; Pasewark RA; Bieber S Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3365477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors associated with recommitment of NGRI acquittees to a forensic hospital. Green D; Belfi B; Griswold H; Schreiber JM; Prentky R; Kunz M Behav Sci Law; 2014 Sep; 32(5):608-26. PubMed ID: 25116184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ending Disparities and Achieving Justice for Individuals with Mental Disabilities. Shea SE; Goldman R Albany Law Rev; 2017; 80(3):1037-101. PubMed ID: 30990588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mentally disordered offenders and the law: Research update on the insanity defense, 2004-2019. Adjorlolo S; Chan HCO; DeLisi M Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 67():101507. PubMed ID: 31785724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using the HCR-20 Cabeldue M; Green D; Griswold H; Schneider M; Smith J; Belfi B; Kunz M J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Sep; 46(3):339-350. PubMed ID: 30368466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. "Reasonable medical certainty": can we meet Daubert standards in insanity cases? Poythress NG J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 15515909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial. Klein DW Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The review panel process: an algorithm for the conditional release of insanity acquittees. McDermott BE; Thompson JW Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 16386791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]