These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27021451)

  • 1. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction.
    Abbas NH; Sabet NE; Hassan IT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 27021451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics.
    Aboul-Ela SM; El-Beialy AR; El-Sayed KM; Selim EM; El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21300255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of piezocision and laser-assisted flapless corticotomy in the acceleration of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Alfawal AMH; Hajeer MY; Ajaj MA; Hamadah O; Brad B
    Head Face Med; 2018 Feb; 14(1):4. PubMed ID: 29454369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Eid FY; El-Kalza AR
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Aug; 24(1):1024. PubMed ID: 39215274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
    Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Duration and anchorage management of canine retraction with bodily versus tipping mechanics.
    Shpack N; Davidovitch M; Sarne O; Panayi N; Vardimon AD
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 18193953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of corticotomy-facilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units.
    Mostafa YA; Mohamed Salah Fayed M; Mehanni S; ElBokle NN; Heider AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 19815161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yang C; Wang C; Deng F; Fan Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces.
    Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetric severe skeletal Class II division 1 patient with temporomandibular joint disorder treated with zygomatic anchorage devices and Ni-Ti alloy wires.
    Ishida T; Ono T
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):919-30. PubMed ID: 24713069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics using piezosurgery versus rotary instruments: an experimental study.
    Farid KA; Mostafa YA; Kaddah MA; El-Sharaby FA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2014 Oct; 16(4):103-8. PubMed ID: 25654963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A pilot clinical study of Class III surgical patients facilitated by improved accelerated osteogenic orthodontic treatments.
    Wu J; Jiang JH; Xu L; Liang C; Bai Y; Zou W
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 25347045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of alveolar corticotomies in orthodontic anchorage management.
    Echchadi Mel M
    Int Orthod; 2014 Jun; 12(2):171-87. PubMed ID: 24813102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of low-intensity laser therapy in reducing treatment time and orthodontic pain: a clinical investigation.
    Doshi-Mehta G; Bhad-Patil WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):289-297. PubMed ID: 22381489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
    Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial.
    Al-Naoum F; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1880-9. PubMed ID: 25128922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.