984 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27021754)
1. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.
Howard K; Salkeld G
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 18657102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening.
de Bekker-Grob EW; Hol L; Donkers B; van Dam L; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW
Value Health; 2010; 13(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 19912597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of presenting information about invasive follow-up testing on individuals' noninvasive colorectal cancer screening participation decision: results from a discrete choice experiment.
Benning TM; Dellaert BG; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 25128051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Words or graphics to present a Discrete Choice Experiment: Does it matter?
Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; van Til JA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Nov; 98(11):1376-84. PubMed ID: 26117796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study.
Veldwijk J; Determann D; Lambooij MS; van Til JA; Korfage IJ; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():45. PubMed ID: 27098746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study.
Veldwijk J; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM; Kihlbom U; Langenskiöld S; Dekker E; Kallenberg FGJ; de Wit GA; Lambooij MS
Patient Prefer Adherence; 2019; 13():273-282. PubMed ID: 30863017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Valuations of genetic test information for treatable conditions: the case of colorectal cancer screening.
Kilambi V; Johnson FR; González JM; Mohamed AF
Value Health; 2014 Dec; 17(8):838-45. PubMed ID: 25498779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization.
Nayaradou M; Berchi C; Dejardin O; Launoy G
Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19692710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Veldwijk J; Johansson JV; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW
Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 32762997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experiment.
Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; Kallenberg FG; van Kranen HJ; Bredenoord AL; Dekker E; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Mar; 24(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 26036860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis.
Hummel JM; Steuten LG; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CJ; Mulder N; Ijzerman MJ
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Oct; 11(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 23979875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Vass C; Rigby D; Tate K; Stewart A; Payne K
Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):658-672. PubMed ID: 30074879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does It Matter How You Ask? Assessing the Impact of Failure or Effectiveness Framing on Preferences for Antibiotic Treatments in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Smith IP; Ancillotti M; de Bekker-Grob EW; Veldwijk J
Patient Prefer Adherence; 2022; 16():2921-2936. PubMed ID: 36324822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?
de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Bliemer MCJ; Veldwijk J; Swait JD
Soc Sci Med; 2020 Feb; 246():112736. PubMed ID: 31887626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient preference for a long-acting recombinant FSH product in ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a discrete choice experiment.
van den Wijngaard L; Rodijk IC; van der Veen F; Gooskens-van Erven MH; Koks CA; Verhoeve HR; Mol BW; van Wely M; Mochtar MH
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 25432926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of including an opt-out option in discrete choice experiments.
Veldwijk J; Lambooij MS; de Bekker-Grob EW; Smit HA; de Wit GA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111805. PubMed ID: 25365169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK.
Dennison RA; Thomas CV; Morris S; Usher-Smith JA
Prev Med; 2023 Dec; 177():107786. PubMed ID: 37984646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
