691 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27021755)
1. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.
Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.
Kreimeier S; Oppe M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cole A; Devlin N; Herdman M; Mulhern B; Shah KK; Stolk E; Rivero-Arias O; Greiner W
Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 30442276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
M Versteegh M; M Vermeulen K; M A A Evers S; de Wit GA; Prenger R; A Stolk E
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 27325326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.
Hobbins A; Barry L; Kelleher D; Shah K; Devlin N; Goni JMR; O'Neill C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1345-1353. PubMed ID: 30051267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valuing EQ-5D-5L health states 'in context' using a discrete choice experiment.
Cole A; Shah K; Mulhern B; Feng Y; Devlin N
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 May; 19(4):595-605. PubMed ID: 28569351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies.
Shah K; Mulhern B; Longworth L; Janssen MF
Value Health; 2016 Jan; 19(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 26797236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time trade-off and ranking exercises are sensitive to different dimensions of EQ-5D health states.
Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA
Value Health; 2012; 15(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 22867789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China.
Luo N; Liu G; Li M; Guan H; Jin X; Rand-Hendriksen K
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):662-669. PubMed ID: 28408009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.
Burström K; Teni FS; Gerdtham UG; Leidl R; Helgesson G; Rolfson O; Henriksson M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Aug; 38(8):839-856. PubMed ID: 32307663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states.
Norman R; Cronin P; Viney R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 23649892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?
Mulhern B; Norman R; Lorgelly P; Lancsar E; Ratcliffe J; Brazier J; Viney R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 27873226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan.
Lee HY; Hung MC; Hu FC; Chang YY; Hsieh CL; Wang JD
J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 Nov; 112(11):699-706. PubMed ID: 24183199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.
Oppe M; Devlin NJ; van Hout B; Krabbe PF; de Charro F
Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24969006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.
Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
