125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27022217)
1. Ultrasound virtual endoscopy: Polyp detection and reliability of measurement in an in vitro study with pig intestine specimens.
Liu JY; Chen LD; Cai HS; Liang JY; Xu M; Huang Y; Li W; Feng ST; Xie XY; Lu MD; Wang W
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 22(12):3355-62. PubMed ID: 27022217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT colonography predictably overestimates colonic length and distance to polyps compared with optical colonoscopy.
Duncan JE; McNally MP; Sweeney WB; Gentry AB; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 19843744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population.
Summers RM; Yao J; Pickhardt PJ; Franaszek M; Bitter I; Brickman D; Krishna V; Choi JR
Gastroenterology; 2005 Dec; 129(6):1832-44. PubMed ID: 16344052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings.
Baker ME; Bogoni L; Obuchowski NA; Dass C; Kendzierski RM; Remer EM; Einstein DM; Cathier P; Jerebko A; Lakare S; Blum A; Caroline DF; Macari M
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 17885187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps.
Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JG; Kim JH; Lefere PA; Han JK; Choi BI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17579150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual vs. optical colonoscopy in symptomatic gastroenterology out-patients: the case for virtual imaging followed by targeted diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy.
Bose M; Bell J; Jackson L; Casey P; Saunders J; Epstein O
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Sep; 26(5):727-36. PubMed ID: 17697206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement.
Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Woo JY; Chung SY; Kim YJ; Han JK; Ha HK
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):157-67. PubMed ID: 18033755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonography: automatic measurement of polyp diameter compared with manual assessment - an in-vivo study.
Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor SA; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME
Clin Radiol; 2007 Feb; 62(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 17207697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography.
Dachman AH; Lieberman J; Osnis RB; Chen SY; Hoffmann KR; Chen CT; Newmark GM; McGill J
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):427-30. PubMed ID: 9114099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative performance of two polyp detection systems on CT colonography.
Fletcher JG; Booya F; Summers RM; Roy D; Guendel L; Schmidt B; McCollough CH; Fidler JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Aug; 189(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17646451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
