101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27023013)
1. Acoustic Properties of Collagenous Matrices of Xenogenic Origin for Tympanic Membrane Reconstruction.
Schwarz D; Pazen D; Gosz K; Schwarz S; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Koerber L; Breiter R; Rotter N; Beutner D
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 27023013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction.
Zahnert T; Hüttenbrink KB; Mürbe D; Bornitz M
Am J Otol; 2000 May; 21(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 10821543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Acoustic and mechanical properties of tympanic membrane transplants].
Zahnert T; Bornitz M; Hüttenbrink KB
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Dec; 76(12):717-23. PubMed ID: 9487483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic properties of different cartilage reconstruction techniques of the tympanic membrane.
Mürbe D; Zahnert T; Bornitz M; Hüttenbrink KB
Laryngoscope; 2002 Oct; 112(10):1769-76. PubMed ID: 12368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repair of subtotal tympanic membrane perforations: A temporal bone study of several tympanoplasty materials.
Eldaebes MMAS; Landry TG; Bance ML
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222728. PubMed ID: 31536572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Candidate's thesis: Revision tympanoplasty utilizing fossa triangularis cartilage.
Moore GF
Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1543-54. PubMed ID: 12352661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Cartilage Overlay on the Tympanic Membrane: Lessons From a Temporal Bone Study for Cartilage Tympanoplasty.
Eldaebes MMAS; Landry TG; Bance ML
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):995-1004. PubMed ID: 29957671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography.
Aarnisalo AA; Cheng JT; Ravicz ME; Furlong C; Merchant SN; Rosowski JJ
Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):78-84. PubMed ID: 19909803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design, fabrication, and in vitro testing of novel three-dimensionally printed tympanic membrane grafts.
Kozin ED; Black NL; Cheng JT; Cotler MJ; McKenna MJ; Lee DJ; Lewis JA; Rosowski JJ; Remenschneider AK
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():191-203. PubMed ID: 26994661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of type I tympanoplasty on the resonant frequency of the middle ear: comparison between chondrotympanoplasty and temporalis fascia grafting.
Iacovou E; Vlastarakos PV; Panagiotakopoulou A; Chrysostomou M; Kandiloros D; Adamopoulos G; Ferekidis E
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 22498263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fascia versus cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological outcome.
Kim JY; Oh JH; Lee HH
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e605-8. PubMed ID: 23172493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cartilage tympanoplasty: how to reduce surgery time.
De Seta E; Covelli E; De Seta D; Mancini P; Filipo R
J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Jul; 124(7):784-5. PubMed ID: 20219145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of hearing levels and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques: preliminary results].
Solmaz MA; Yücel EA; Ozdemir M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12422082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canal wall up tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. Comparison of hearing results between cartilage and PORP on stapes and impact of malleus removal and total reinforcement of the tympanic membrane by cartilage.
Quérat C; Martin C; Prades JM; Richard C
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2014 Sep; 131(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 24954899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cartilage tympanoplasty for management of tympanic membrane atelectasis: is ventilatory tube necessary?
Elsheikh MN; Elsherief HS; Elsherief SG
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Sep; 27(6):859-64. PubMed ID: 16788419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative acoustic performance and mechanical properties of silk membranes for the repair of chronic tympanic membrane perforations.
Allardyce BJ; Rajkhowa R; Dilley RJ; Xie Z; Campbell L; Keating A; Atlas MD; von Unge M; Wang X
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Dec; 64():65-74. PubMed ID: 27479895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts.
Abdelghany AM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23745532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perichondrium/cartilage composite graft for repairing large tympanic membrane perforations and hearing improvement.
Chen XW; Yang H; Gao RZ; Yu R; Gao ZQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Feb; 123(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 20193249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The application of U-shaped cartilage-perichondrium tympanoplastyfor subtotal tympanic membrane perforation].
Zhang SZ; Song J; Zhong MS; Zhang ZH
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 30(14):1139-1141. PubMed ID: 29798441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review.
Mohamad SH; Khan I; Hussain SS
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 22643445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
