These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

852 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27023050)

  • 1. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
    Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture of totally implanted central venous access devices: a propensity-score-matched comparison of risks for Groshong silicone versus polyurethane catheters.
    Kojima S; Hiraki T; Gobara H; Iguchi T; Fujiwara H; Matsui Y; Mitsuhashi T; Kanazawa S
    J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov; 17(6):535-541. PubMed ID: 27768210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complication Rates Observed in Silicone and Polyurethane Catheters of Totally Implanted Central Venous Access Devices Implanted in the Upper Arm.
    Busch JD; Vens M; Mahler C; Herrmann J; Adam G; Ittrich H
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1177-1183. PubMed ID: 28549710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term and long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of central venous access port devices implanted at the forearm: a retrospective monocenter analysis in 1704 patients.
    Wildgruber M; Borgmeyer S; Haller B; Jansen H; Gaa J; Kiechle M; Meier R; Ettl J; Berger H
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):606-16. PubMed ID: 25239184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm: An observational study.
    Alfonso Alvarez-Rodríguez J; García-Suárez M; Fernández-García D; Méndez-Martínez C; Gómez-Salgado J
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Nov; 27(6):e12929. PubMed ID: 30298954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.
    Taxbro K; Hammarskjöld F; Thelin B; Lewin F; Hagman H; Hanberger H; Berg S
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Jun; 122(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 31005243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
    Biffi R; Corrado F; de Braud F; de Lucia F; Scarpa D; Testori A; Orsi F; Bellomi M; Mauri S; Aapro M; Andreoni B
    Eur J Cancer; 1997 Jul; 33(8):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9301441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
    Beckers MM; Ruven HJ; Seldenrijk CA; Prins MH; Biesma DH
    Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
    Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
    Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polyurethane versus silicone port a cath: What's going on at removal?
    Alzahrani K; Lejeune J; Lakhal W; Morel B; Cook AR; Braïk K; Lardy H; Binet A
    J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Jul; 53(7):1417-1419. PubMed ID: 28689888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explantation of totally implantable venous access ports of the forearm: reasons for removal and observed complications.
    Goltz JP; Kickuth R; Scholl A; Machann W; Ritter CO; Hahn D; Wittenberg G
    J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21038301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients.
    Goltz JP; Scholl A; Ritter CO; Wittenberg G; Hahn D; Kickuth R
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20414657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients].
    Lenhart M; Schätzler S; Manke C; Strotzer M; Seitz J; Gmeinwieser J; Völk M; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Herold T; Paetzel C
    Rofo; 2010 Jan; 182(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19536729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications.
    Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D
    J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late fracture of Groshong ports: A report of the three cases.
    Saijo F; Mutoh M; Tokumine J; Yoshinobu O; Hama H; Namima T; Shibahara M; Tokumura H
    J Vasc Access; 2019 Sep; 20(5):563-566. PubMed ID: 30854915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two types of catheters through femoral vein catheterization in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A retrospective study.
    Xu B; Zhang J; Tang S; Hou J; Ma M
    J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):651-657. PubMed ID: 29701120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications.
    Teichgräber UK; Kausche S; Nagel SN
    J Vasc Access; 2011; 12(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 21534232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.
    Xu H; Chen R; Jiang C; You S; Zhu Q; Li Y; Li S; Zha X; Wang J
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Sep; 21(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 31841061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous implantation of peripherally inserted totally implantable venous access systems in the forearm in adolescent patients.
    Augustin AM; Kertels O; Wiegering V; Thurner A; Kickuth R
    Pediatr Radiol; 2022 Jul; 52(8):1550-1558. PubMed ID: 35368211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.