These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27023153)

  • 1. Using a Spreadsheet to Compute the Maximum Wind Sector 99.5th Percentile X/Q Value in Accordance with DOE-STD-3009-2014.
    Vickers L
    Health Phys; 2016 May; 110(5 Suppl 2):S67-72. PubMed ID: 27023153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An update on a spreadsheet method for computing consequences to the nearest maximally exposed offsite individual in compliance with DOE-STD-3009-94.
    Vickers L
    Health Phys; 2015 Feb; 108(1 Suppl 1):S42-9. PubMed ID: 25551652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Microsoft Excel to compute the 5% overall site X/Q value and the 95th percentile of the distribution of doses to the nearest maximally exposed offsite individual (MEOI).
    Vickers LD
    Health Phys; 2010 May; 98 Suppl 2():S48-55. PubMed ID: 20386192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Location Modification Factors for Potential Dose Estimation.
    Snyder SF; Barnett JM
    Health Phys; 2017 Jul; 113(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 28542013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Gaussian atmospheric transport model and its sensitivity to the joint frequency distribution and parametric variability.
    Hamby DM
    Health Phys; 2002 Jan; 82(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 11768800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Cloudshine Gamma Dose Calculations in the CAP-88 Dispersion Model.
    McNaughton MW; Gillis JM; Ruedig E; Whicker JJ; Fuehne DP
    Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):414-419. PubMed ID: 28234703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kalman filtration of radiation monitoring data from atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials.
    Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H; Smith JQ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 15266085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dispersion of positron emitting radioactive gases in a complex urban building array: a comparison of dose modelling approaches.
    Gallacher DJ; Robins AG; Burt A; Chadwick S; Hayden P; Williams M
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Dec; 36(4):746-784. PubMed ID: 27655037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of a Kalman filter based method for on-line estimation of atmospheric dispersion parameters using radiation monitoring data.
    Drews M; Lauritzen B; Madsen H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):75-89. PubMed ID: 15572402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Solutions to the Gaussian cloud approximation for gamma absorbed dose.
    Overcamp TJ
    Health Phys; 2007 Jan; 92(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 17164603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation of radioactive plume gamma dose over a complex terrain using Lagrangian particle dispersion model.
    Rakesh PT; Venkatesan R; Hedde T; Roubin P; Baskaran R; Venkatraman B
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Jul; 145():30-39. PubMed ID: 25863323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraction of the positive 218Po and 214Pb clusters in indoor air.
    Porstendörfer J; Pagelkopf P; Gründel M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 15829554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods.
    Minter KM; Jannik GT; Stagich BH; Dixon KL; Newton JR
    Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 29481531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of U.S. NRC'S Rascal Emergency Response Code with Noaa's Hyrad Dispersion Model and Tracer Experimental Data.
    Abbott ML
    Health Phys; 2018 Oct; 115(4):448-457. PubMed ID: 30148810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of total effective dose equivalent and collective dose in the event of a LOCA in Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant.
    Raisali G; Davilu H; Haghighishad A; Khodadadi R; Sabet M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16785243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulation of atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides using an Eulerian-Lagrangian modelling system.
    Basit A; Espinosa F; Avila R; Raza S; Irfan N
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec; 28(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 19029589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk-based containment and air monitoring criteria for work with dispersible radioactive materials.
    Veluri VR; Justus AL
    Health Phys; 2013 Apr; 104(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 23439146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examination of the uncertainty in air concentration predictions using Hanford field data.
    Miller CW; Fields DE; Cotter SJ
    Health Phys; 1988 Aug; 55(2):443-50. PubMed ID: 3410717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Protection of the population from electromagnetic radiation as the health problem].
    Dumanskiĭ IuD
    Gig Sanit; 1989 Oct; (10):63-7. PubMed ID: 2689290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of National Weather Service Data to Compute the Dose to the MEOI.
    Vickers L
    Health Phys; 2018 May; 114(5):549-566. PubMed ID: 29578904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.