These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2702380)

  • 41. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
    Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Advantages of a 400 speed image receptor system for cast radiography.
    Gratale P; Burns CB; Murray J
    Radiol Technol; 1987; 58(5):401-3. PubMed ID: 3588882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A clinical trial of a rare earth screen/film system in a periapical cassette.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Lubus NJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 6584846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications.
    Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K
    Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
    Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):163-7. PubMed ID: 2924096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of two detail screen-film systems using a rheumatoid erosion model.
    De Smet AA; Goin JE; Arnett GR; Chang CH; Martin NL; Rosenthal SJ
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 6618826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of two mammography film-screen combinations designed for standard-cycle processing.
    McParland BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jan; 72(853):73-5. PubMed ID: 10341692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Diagnosis of metastases in thoracic images. Progress by further development of the conventional film-foil technique?].
    Lehmann KJ; Himmighöfer U
    Radiologe; 1994 Oct; 34(10):592-8. PubMed ID: 7816917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Noise transfer in screen-film subtraction radiography.
    Shaw A; Moores BM
    Phys Med Biol; 1985 Mar; 30(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 3885267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of a new mammographic film: methods and considerations.
    Tsalafoutas OA; Kolovos CA; Tsapaki V; Betsou S; Koliakou E; Maniatis PN; Xenofos S
    Health Phys; 2008 Apr; 94(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 18332725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
    Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Image resolution in the midsagittal plane of the Orthopantomograph-10 using Lanex regular and T-Mat G screen-film combination.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Oct; 74(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 1408031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Characterization of the reciprocity law failure in three mammography screen-film systems.
    de Almeida A; Sobol WT; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 10360527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
    Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of a new dual characteristic film-screen system (insight) with a standard film-screen system for chest radiology.
    Logan PM; Tunney T; McCoy CT; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):162-5. PubMed ID: 8130978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Multiple simultaneous stratigraphy. Results with a 5-plane system for pediatric use].
    Iannaccone G; Capocaccia P; Boi A; Calì M; Del Chierico G; Morelli C; Ricci L
    Radiol Med; 1988 Oct; 76(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 3187090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical comparison of conventional and rare earth screen-film systems for cephalometric radiographs.
    Kaugars GE; Fatouros P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 6950349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Characterization of new portal film systems for radiotherapy verification.
    Langmack KA; Goss V
    Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):479-84. PubMed ID: 10505013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dose efficiency of screen-film systems used in pediatric radiography.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; McDaniel DL; Robinson LH
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 6729110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.