These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2702380)

  • 61. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Intensifying screens: speed, definition, afterglow and abrasion resistance (author's transl)].
    de Moras Y; Lucas P; Bergeret B; Picard F; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M
    J Radiol; 1982 Mar; 63(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 7108845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Reduction of radiation dosage in mammography by using film intensifying foil systems in Poland].
    Iwaszkiewicz K; Bończyk J
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1991 Apr 22-29; 46(17-18):346-8. PubMed ID: 1669071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Radiographic mottle and patient exposure in mammography.
    Barnes GT; Chakraborty DP
    Radiology; 1982 Dec; 145(3):815-21. PubMed ID: 7146416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Dose measurements in pediatric excretory urography using a new film-screen combination].
    Reither M; Brozik P; Schorn B
    Rontgenpraxis; 1983 May; 36(5):170-2. PubMed ID: 6867863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Application of T grain technique to the diagnosis of lung disease and analysis of its image quality].
    Liu XJ; Liu PC; Cai P; Zhang D; Yao SS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 21(3):206-8. PubMed ID: 14761490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography.
    Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evaluation of a new rare-earth screen for skeletal radiography.
    De Smet AA; Ritter EM; Fritz SL; Martin NL; Chang CH; Templeton AW
    Radiology; 1981 Nov; 141(2):542-3. PubMed ID: 7291587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography.
    Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Contrast reduction using energy dependent intensifying screens.
    Shah GA; Hassam G; Newman DL
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 69(822):563-6. PubMed ID: 8757660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Skin edge perception in mammograms: a comparison of two film-screen combinations.
    Meeson S; Young KC; Cooke J
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Apr; 73(868):370-5. PubMed ID: 10844862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. New self-developing film for intraoperative renal stone localization.
    Pahira JJ; Pollack HM
    Urology; 1985 Apr; 25(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 3984133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Are high-intensifying film-screen combinations suitable for the detection of fine interstitial lung changes? The results of a ROC study with an anthropomorphic thorax phantom].
    Müller RD; John V; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; Blendl C; Hirche H; Ewen K; Löhr E
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 8334259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Comparison of interpretation of digitized images and screen-film radiographs.
    Keesling CA; Miller I; Taylor CN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):848-9. PubMed ID: 10470951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Evaluation of a cassette-screen-film combination for radiation therapy portal localization imaging with improved contrast.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE; Huff KE; Monte S; Schlager BA; Atanas M; Matloubieh A
    Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1605-8. PubMed ID: 9350713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Clinical testing of the Ultra-Vision screen-film system for maxillofacial radiography.
    Sewerin IP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 8170665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.