1057 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27025228)
1. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs.
Kayser L; Kushniruk A; Osborne RH; Norgaard O; Turner P
JMIR Hum Factors; 2015 May; 2(1):e9. PubMed ID: 27025228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward Inclusive Approaches in the Design, Development, and Implementation of eHealth in the Intellectual Disability Sector: Scoping Review.
van Calis JFE; Bevelander KE; van der Cruijsen AWC; Leusink GL; Naaldenberg J
J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e45819. PubMed ID: 37252756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A framework for characterizing eHealth literacy demands and barriers.
Chan CV; Kaufman DR
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e94. PubMed ID: 22094891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies.
LeRouge C; Ma J; Sneha S; Tolle K
Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e251-68. PubMed ID: 21481635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating Key User Characteristics in User-Centered Design of Digital Support Systems for Seniors' Physical Activity Interventions to Prevent Falls: Protocol for a Usability Study.
Revenäs Å; Johansson AC; Ehn M
JMIR Res Protoc; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e20061. PubMed ID: 33346732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study Protocol for the Development of a European eHealth Platform to Improve Quality of Life in Individuals With Huntington's Disease and Their Partners (HD-eHelp Study): A User-Centered Design Approach.
van Lonkhuizen PJC; Vegt NJH; Meijer E; van Duijn E; de Bot ST; Klempíř J; Frank W; Landwehrmeyer GB; Mühlbäck A; Hoblyn J; Squitieri F; Foley P; Chavannes NH; Heemskerk AW
Front Neurol; 2021; 12():719460. PubMed ID: 34589047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying Persuasive Design Principles and Behavior Change Techniques Supporting End User Values and Needs in eHealth Interventions for Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance: Qualitative Study.
Asbjørnsen RA; Wentzel J; Smedsrød ML; Hjelmesæth J; Clark MM; Solberg Nes L; Van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e22598. PubMed ID: 33252347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applying the Electronic Health Literacy Lens: Systematic Review of Electronic Health Interventions Targeted at Socially Disadvantaged Groups.
Cheng C; Beauchamp A; Elsworth GR; Osborne RH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18476. PubMed ID: 32788144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.
Cheng C; Elsworth GR; Osborne RH
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e32777. PubMed ID: 35258475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ill Literates or Illiterates? Investigating the eHealth Literacy of Users of Online Health Communities.
Petrič G; Atanasova S; Kamin T
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e331. PubMed ID: 28978496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Participatory Methods to Engage Health Service Users in the Development of Electronic Health Resources: Systematic Review.
Moore G; Wilding H; Gray K; Castle D
J Particip Med; 2019 Feb; 11(1):e11474. PubMed ID: 33055069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient and healthcare professional eHealth literacy and needs for systemic sclerosis support: a mixed methods study.
Kocher A; Simon M; Dwyer AA; Blatter C; Bogdanovic J; Künzler-Heule P; Villiger PM; Dan D; Distler O; Walker UA; Nicca D
RMD Open; 2021 Sep; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 34475248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From users involvement to users' needs understanding: a case study.
Niès J; Pelayo S
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e76-82. PubMed ID: 19660983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Qualitative Methods to Create a Home Health Web Application User Interface for Patients with Low Computer Proficiency.
Baier RR; Cooper E; Wysocki A; Gravenstein S; Clark M
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2015; 3(2):1166. PubMed ID: 26290893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale.
Norman CD; Skinner HA
J Med Internet Res; 2006 Nov; 8(4):e27. PubMed ID: 17213046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. User Requirements for Comanaged Digital Health and Care: Review.
Chute C; French T; Raman S; Bradley J
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jun; 24(6):e35337. PubMed ID: 35687379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. End Users' Perspectives on the Quality and Design of mHealth Technologies During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines: Qualitative Study.
Gonzales A; Custodio R; Lapitan MC; Ladia MA
JMIR Form Res; 2023 Apr; 7():e41838. PubMed ID: 36943932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposing a Transactional Model of eHealth Literacy: Concept Analysis.
Paige SR; Stellefson M; Krieger JL; Anderson-Lewis C; Cheong J; Stopka C
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Oct; 20(10):e10175. PubMed ID: 30279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
