These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27025502)

  • 1. Do Arabic numerals activate magnitude automatically? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Ford N; Reynolds MG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1528-1533. PubMed ID: 27025502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic identification of familiar faces.
    Jung K; Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1438-50. PubMed ID: 23749679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-digit Arabic numbers do not automatically activate magnitude representations in adults or in children: evidence from the symbolic same-different task.
    Wong B; Szücs D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):488-98. PubMed ID: 24076332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Kerusauskaite SG; Simione L; Raffone A; Srinivasan N
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 31925476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endogenous attention modulates automaticity of number processing.
    Avitan A; Wasserman S; Henik A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 38169041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period.
    Brisson B; Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19000734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1303-23. PubMed ID: 17154774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jolicoeur P; Sessa P; Dell'Acqua R; Robitaille N
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):414-24. PubMed ID: 16184394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual route for subtask order control: Evidence from the psychological refractory paradigm.
    Luria R; Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):720-44. PubMed ID: 16707359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the mental number line: evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Müller D; Schwarz W
    Psychol Res; 2007 Sep; 71(5):598-613. PubMed ID: 16786352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: uncoupling of lateralized response codes.
    Ivry RB; Franz EA; Kingstone A; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):463-80. PubMed ID: 9554094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching.
    Hirsch P; Nolden S; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):569-580. PubMed ID: 28080113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.
    Strobach T; Karbach J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104866. PubMed ID: 32531496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 17343714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional modulation of orthographic neighborhood effects during reading: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in a psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Rabovsky M; Conrad M; Álvarez CJ; Paschke-Goldt J; Sommer W
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0199084. PubMed ID: 30682023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.