180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27025548)
1. Bacterial and fungal contamination risks in human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation: open versus closed vitrification systems.
Molina I; Mari M; Martínez JV; Novella-Maestre E; Pellicer N; Pemán J
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 27025548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification in an oocyte donation programme: a prospective randomized sibling oocyte study.
De Munck N; Santos-Ribeiro S; Stoop D; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 26724798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A reliable procedure for decontamination before thawing of human specimens cryostored in liquid nitrogen: three washes with sterile liquid nitrogen (SLN2).
Parmegiani L; Accorsi A; Bernardi S; Arnone A; Cognigni GE; Filicori M
Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):870-5. PubMed ID: 22795638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Closed oocyte vitrification and storage in an oocyte donation programme: obstetric and neonatal outcome.
De Munck N; Belva F; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G; Stoop D
Hum Reprod; 2016 May; 31(5):1024-33. PubMed ID: 26936884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Viral screening of spent culture media and liquid nitrogen samples of oocytes and embryos from hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency virus chronically infected women undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles.
Cobo A; Bellver J; de los Santos MJ; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2012 Jan; 97(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 22035968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A prospective study to compare the efficiency of oocyte vitrification using closed or open devices].
Sarandi S; Herbemont C; Sermondade N; Benoit A; Sonigo C; Poncelet C; Benard J; Gronier H; Boujenah J; Grynberg M; Sifer C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 May; 44(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 26968255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contamination of single-straw carrier for vitrification.
Parmegiani L; Vajta G
Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(8):e69; author reply e70. PubMed ID: 21561611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos.
Vajta G; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr; 30(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 25639657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Appendix E: Rapid-i
Larman MG
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1568():335-342. PubMed ID: 28421509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of contamination of germplasm during cryopreservation and cryobanking in IVF units.
Bielanski A; Vajta G
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2457-67. PubMed ID: 19561041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aseptic technology of vitrification of human pronuclear oocytes using open-pulled straws.
Isachenko V; Montag M; Isachenko E; Zaeva V; Krivokharchenko I; Shafei R; van der Ven H
Hum Reprod; 2005 Feb; 20(2):492-6. PubMed ID: 15528262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices.
Bielanski A
Theriogenology; 2012 Feb; 77(3):467-82. PubMed ID: 21958629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open versus closed oocyte vitrification system: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study.
Papatheodorou A; Vanderzwalmen P; Panagiotidis Y; Prapas N; Zikopoulos K; Georgiou I; Prapas Y
Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Jun; 26(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 23602678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New methods for cooling and storing oocytes and embryos in a clean environment of -196°C.
Arav A; Natan Y; Levi-Setti PE; Menduni F; Patrizio P
Reprod Biomed Online; 2016 Jul; 33(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 27131833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closed vitrification of human oocytes and blastocysts: outcomes from a series of clinical cases.
Gook DA; Choo B; Bourne H; Lewis K; Edgar DH
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Sep; 33(9):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27233650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How does closed system vitrification of human oocytes affect the clinical outcome? A prospective, observational, cohort, noninferiority trial in an oocyte donation program.
Papatheodorou A; Vanderzwalmen P; Panagiotidis Y; Petousis S; Gullo G; Kasapi E; Goudakou M; Prapas N; Zikopoulos K; Georgiou I; Prapas Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1348-1355. PubMed ID: 27490043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme.
Stoop D; De Munck N; Jansen E; Platteau P; Van den Abbeel E; Verheyen G; Devroey P
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Feb; 24(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22222248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen.
Bielanski A; Bergeron H; Lau PC; Devenish J
Cryobiology; 2003 Apr; 46(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 12686204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biosafety in embryos and semen cryopreservation, storage, management and transport.
Bielanski A
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 753():429-65. PubMed ID: 25091919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental Evidence Reveals Both Cross-Infection and Cross-Contamination Risk of Embryo Storage in Liquid Nitrogen Biobanks.
Marin C; Garcia-Dominguez X; Montoro-Dasi L; Lorenzo-Rebenaque L; Vicente JS; Marco-Jimenez F
Animals (Basel); 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32244732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
