These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27025849)

  • 1. Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?
    Vandvik PO; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH
    BMC Med; 2016 Mar; 14():59. PubMed ID: 27025849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Living network meta-analysis was feasible when considering the pace of evidence generation.
    Créquit P; Martin-Montoya T; Attiche N; Trinquart L; Vivot A; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():10-16. PubMed ID: 30552957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis.
    Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic review and meta-analysis as a support tools for research and clinical practice.
    Villasís-Keever MÁ; Rendón-Macías ME; García H; Miranda-Novales MG; Escamilla-Núñez A
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2020; 67(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 32447868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency.
    Welch VA; Tricco AC
    BMC Med; 2016 Jul; 14(1):109. PubMed ID: 27443561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research Techniques Made Simple: Network Meta-Analysis.
    Watt J; Tricco AC; Straus S; Veroniki AA; Naglie G; Drucker AM
    J Invest Dermatol; 2019 Jan; 139(1):4-12.e1. PubMed ID: 30579427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
    Afshari A
    Dan Med Bull; 2011 Sep; 58(9):B4316. PubMed ID: 21893014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer.
    Créquit P; Trinquart L; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P
    BMC Med; 2016 Jan; 14():8. PubMed ID: 26792360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!
    Thoma A; Eaves FF
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Nov; 36(10):1198-1201. PubMed ID: 27756743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additional considerations are required when preparing a protocol for a systematic review with multiple interventions.
    Chaimani A; Caldwell DM; Li T; Higgins JPT; Salanti G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():65-74. PubMed ID: 28088593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concepts and emerging issues of network meta-analysis.
    Ahn E; Kang H
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2021 Oct; 74(5):371-382. PubMed ID: 34551467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste.
    Dechartres A; Ravaud P
    BMC Med; 2015 Sep; 13():244. PubMed ID: 26416788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic screening using word embeddings achieved high sensitivity and workload reduction for updating living network meta-analyses.
    Lerner I; Créquit P; Ravaud P; Atal I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():86-94. PubMed ID: 30528791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.
    Harris JD; Brand JC; Cote MP; Dhawan A
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1594-1602. PubMed ID: 28457677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.