132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27026093)
1. Polish scientists among the most influential scientific minds in 2015.
Undas A; Wiesner-Spyrczyńska M
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2016; 126(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 27026093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
Hicks D; Wouters P; Waltman L; de Rijcke S; Rafols I
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):429-31. PubMed ID: 25903611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science.
Csiszar A
Nature; 2017 Nov; 551(7679):163-165. PubMed ID: 29120444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On the right track.
Savage N
Nature; 2017 Aug; 548(7666):S23-S25. PubMed ID: 28792923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce.
Ioannidis JP; Boyack KW; Klavans R
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101698. PubMed ID: 25007173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Productivity and Impact of the Top 100 Cited Huntington's Disease Investigators.
Sorensen AA; El Aisati M; Weedon D
J Huntingtons Dis; 2012; 1(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 26550658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Q&A: Science regeneration.
Wüthrich K; Baker M
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S13. PubMed ID: 25924193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Want to do better science? Admit you're not objective.
Saini A
Nature; 2020 Mar; 579(7798):175. PubMed ID: 32152605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Two Nobels for women - why so slow?
Valian V
Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7726):165. PubMed ID: 30301999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Profiles: Kudos for female Antarctic researchers.
Strugnell J
Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7615):148. PubMed ID: 27510214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Achievement index climbs the ranks.
Ball P
Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):737. PubMed ID: 17700666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fewer numbers, better science.
Benedictus R; Miedema F; Ferguson MW
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7626):453-455. PubMed ID: 27786219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Point/Counterpoint. The future h-index is an excellent way to predict scientists' future impact.
Acuna DE; Penner O; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):110601. PubMed ID: 24320407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated grading of research performance clearly fails to measure up.
Haeffner-Cavaillon N; Graillot-Gak C; Bréchot C
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):559. PubMed ID: 16319861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark.
Kwok R
Nature; 2013 Aug; 500(7463):491-3. PubMed ID: 23977678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientists on Turkey's banknotes should inspire young minds.
Zhdanov R
Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):956. PubMed ID: 19225497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Just a handful of publications can collect the prize.
Carbone M
Nature; 2018 Sep; 561(7724):464. PubMed ID: 30258141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Professor Artur Czyżyk (1927-2012): an excellent doctor, outstanding researcher, and cofounder of Polish diabetology.
Krzymień J
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2012; 122(9):389-91. PubMed ID: 22983186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rising stars.
Phillips N
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):S49. PubMed ID: 27463074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [h Index and scientific output of researchers in medicine from the University of Guadalajara, Mexico].
Panduro A; Ojeda-Granados C; Rivera H; Roman S
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2015; 53(6):716-21. PubMed ID: 26506489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
