111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2702657)
1. Effect of organized screening on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Denmark.
Lynge E; Madsen M; Engholm G
Cancer Res; 1989 Apr; 49(8):2157-60. PubMed ID: 2702657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
Hølund B; Grinsted P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Status of preventive screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark in 1994].
Lynge E; Arffmann E; Erbs K; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jakobsen AB; Jespersen NB; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Jan; 156(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 8140664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What happens when organization of cervical cancer screening is delayed or stopped?
Lynge E; Clausen LB; Guignard R; Poll P
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16569305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
Lynge E; Poll P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Status of preventive examinations against uterine cervix cancer in Denmark].
Lynge E; Arffmann E; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jespersen NB; Lindsø R; Olesen F; Poll P
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1339-42. PubMed ID: 1598707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience.
Sepúlveda C; Prado R
Cancer Detect Prev; 2005; 29(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 16188399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pap smear screening among urban Southwestern American Indian women.
Risendal B; DeZapien J; Fowler B; Papenfuss M; Giuliano A
Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):510-8. PubMed ID: 10600432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical impact of quality assurance in an organized cervical screening program.
Andrae B; Smith P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 May; 78(5):429-35. PubMed ID: 10326890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Characterization of "non-attenders" in an organized screening against cancer of cervix uteri].
Larsen LP; Olesen F
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May; 158(21):2987-91. PubMed ID: 8686037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
