These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27027101)

  • 1. 3D fitting accuracy evaluation of CAD/CAM copings - comparison with spacer design settings.
    Boitelle P; Tapie L; Mawussi B; Fromentin O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 27027101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
    Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Circumferential fit assessment of CAD/CAM single crowns--a pilot investigation on a new virtual analytical protocol.
    Matta RE; Schmitt J; Wichmann M; Holst S
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Oct; 43(9):801-9. PubMed ID: 23041996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings.
    Moldovan O; Luthardt RG; Corcodel N; Rudolph H
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 21983002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between five CAD/CAM systems for fit of zirconia copings.
    Habib SR; Al Otaibi AK; Al Anazi TA; Al Anazi SM
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(6):437-444. PubMed ID: 29756132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
    Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD/CAM zirconia copings.
    Lins L; Bemfica V; Queiroz C; Canabarro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 25453562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
    Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of various gypsum materials on precision of fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia copings.
    Kim JH; Kim KB; Kim WC; Rhee HS; Lee IH; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25748454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal and internal discrepancies of zirconia copings: effects of milling system and finish line design.
    Ribeiro IL; Campos F; Sousa RS; Alves ML; Rodrigues DM; Souza RO; Bottino MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25961609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD-CAM zirconia copings: Comparison of 2D and 3D measurement methods.
    Boitelle P; Tapie L; Mawussi B; Fromentin O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 28461045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the influence of two preparation types on marginal fit of CAD/CAM alumina copings: a pilot study.
    Krasanaki ME; Pelekanos S; Andreiotelli M; Koutayas SO; Eliades G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 22371840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.