These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27029017)

  • 1. Evolution of Imaging in Breast Cancer.
    Garcia EM; Crowley J; Hagan C; Atkinson LL
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):322-35. PubMed ID: 27029017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evolution of breast imaging: past to present.
    Joe BN; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2 Suppl):S23-44. PubMed ID: 25340437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH; Gordon R
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast imaging.
    Kopans DB; Meyer JE; Sadowsky N
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Apr; 310(15):960-7. PubMed ID: 6366562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early detection of breast cancer using mammography, thermography and xeroradiography.
    Brown LF
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1976 Sep; 68(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 1003573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermography, mammography, and clinical examination in breast cancer screening. Review of 16,000 studies.
    Feig SA; Shaber GS; Schwartz GF; Patchefsky A; Libshitz HI; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R; Curley RF; Wallace JD
    Radiology; 1977 Jan; 122(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 830320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified Bi-Rads Scoring of Breast Imaging Findings Improves Clinical Judgment.
    Silberman H; Sheth PA; Parisky YR; Hovanessian-Larsen LJ; Sheth S; Tripathy D
    Breast J; 2015; 21(6):642-50. PubMed ID: 26411901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
    Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emerging controversies in breast imaging: is there a place for thermography?
    Plotnikoff G; Carolyn T
    Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):37-9, 56. PubMed ID: 20092170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Breast cancer imaging].
    Canale S; Balleyguier C; Dromain C
    Rev Prat; 2013 Dec; 63(10):1378-83. PubMed ID: 24579332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast imaging techniques. Mammography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, thermography, and transillumination.
    Martin JE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1983 Mar; 21(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 6836102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
    Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chen SC; Carton AK; Albert M; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 17236995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standardized diagnosis and reporting of breast cancer.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Tardivon A; Chopier J
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014; 95(7-8):759-66. PubMed ID: 25017150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.