101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27029557)
1. Tick tock: time for a change?
Pettigrew S; Talati Z; Neal B
Health Promot J Austr; 2016 Mar; 27(2):102-104. PubMed ID: 27029557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.
Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K
Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling in New Zealand: an exploration of stakeholder views about research and implementation.
Signal L; Lanumata T; Ni Mhurchu C; Gorton D
Health Promot J Austr; 2012 Apr; 23(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 22730939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S
Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children.
Pettigrew S; Talati Z; Miller C; Dixon H; Kelly B; Ball K
Appetite; 2017 Feb; 109():115-123. PubMed ID: 27894969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferring product healthfulness from nutrition labelling. The influence of reference points.
van Herpen E; Hieke S; van Trijp HC
Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():138-49. PubMed ID: 24416796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers' motives in food choice.
Vyth EL; Steenhuis IH; Vlot JA; Wulp A; Hogenes MG; Looije DH; Brug J; Seidell JC
Public Health Nutr; 2010 Nov; 13(11):1882-9. PubMed ID: 20359378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.
White J; Signal L
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2012 Oct; 36(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 23025366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
van Herpen E; Trijp HC
Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T
Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: a consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling.
Hodgkins C; Barnett J; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; Gulcan Y; Kustepeli Y; Akgungor S; Chryssochoidis G; Fernández-Celemin L; Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann S; Gibbs M; Raats M
Appetite; 2012 Dec; 59(3):806-17. PubMed ID: 22918174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of consumers using 'better for you' front-of-pack food labelling schemes - an example from the Australian Heart Foundation Tick.
Williams SL; Mummery KW
Public Health Nutr; 2013 Dec; 16(12):2265-72. PubMed ID: 23182399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: are multiple formats a problem for consumers?
Draper AK; Adamson AJ; Clegg S; Malam S; Rigg M; Duncan S
Eur J Public Health; 2013 Jun; 23(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 22140250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nutrition labelling and the choices logo in Israel: positions and perceptions of leading health policy makers.
Gesser-Edelsburg A; Endevelt R; Tirosh-Kamienchick Y
J Hum Nutr Diet; 2014 Feb; 27(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 23656397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Australian consumers are sceptical about but influenced by claims about fat on food labels.
Chan C; Patch C; Williams P
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Jan; 59(1):148-51. PubMed ID: 15305180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?
Withall E; Wilson AM; Henderson J; Tonkin E; Coveney J; Meyer SB; Clark J; McCullum D; Ankeny R; Ward PR
BMC Public Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):1241. PubMed ID: 27938403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consumers' responses to front-of-pack labels that vary by interpretive content.
Talati Z; Pettigrew S; Kelly B; Ball K; Dixon H; Shilton T
Appetite; 2016 Jun; 101():205-13. PubMed ID: 26970293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of a single health-endorsement logo for South Africa.
Koen N; Wentzel-Viljoen E; Blaauw R
Public Health Nutr; 2018 Jun; 21(8):1444-1454. PubMed ID: 29455703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling.
van Kleef E; van Trijp H; Paeps F; Fernández-Celemín L
Public Health Nutr; 2008 Feb; 11(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 17601362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
