These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27029557)

  • 21. Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts label.
    Dallas SK; Liu PJ; Ubel PA
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():577-84. PubMed ID: 26278876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries.
    Feunekes GI; Gortemaker IA; Willems AA; Lion R; van den Kommer M
    Appetite; 2008 Jan; 50(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 17629351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Guiding healthier food choice: systematic comparison of four front-of-pack labelling systems and their effect on judgements of product healthiness.
    Hodgkins CE; Raats MM; Fife-Schaw C; Peacock M; Gröppel-Klein A; Koenigstorfer J; Wasowicz G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; Gulcan Y; Kustepeli Y; Gibbs M; Shepherd R; Grunert KG
    Br J Nutr; 2015 May; 113(10):1652-63. PubMed ID: 25893314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of nutrition labels and advertising claims in altering consumers' evaluation and choice.
    Bialkova S; Sasse L; Fenko A
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():38-46. PubMed ID: 26341955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Influence of Nutrition Labeling and Point-of-Purchase Information on Food Behaviours.
    Volkova E; Ni Mhurchu C
    Curr Obes Rep; 2015 Mar; 4(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 26627087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Helping consumers make more healthful food choices: consumer views on modifying food labels and providing point-of-purchase nutrition information at quick-service restaurants.
    Lando AM; Labiner-Wolfe J
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2007; 39(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 17493566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A case study of sodium reduction in breakfast cereals and the impact of the Pick the Tick food information program in Australia.
    Williams P; McMahon A; Boustead R
    Health Promot Int; 2003 Mar; 18(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 12571092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methodological quality of front-of-pack labeling studies: a review plus identification of research challenges.
    Vyth EL; Steenhuis IH; Brandt HE; Roodenburg AJ; Brug J; Seidell JC
    Nutr Rev; 2012 Dec; 70(12):709-20. PubMed ID: 23206284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of front-of-pack nutrition symbols: a pilot study with consumers.
    Emrich TE; Mendoza JE; L'Abbé MR
    Can J Diet Pract Res; 2012; 73(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 23217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating food front-of-pack labelling: a pan-European survey on consumers' attitudes toward food labelling.
    Gregori D; Ballali S; Vögele C; Gafare CE; Stefanini G; Widhalm K
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2014 Mar; 65(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 24224854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ignorance is bliss. How parents of preschool children make sense of front-of-package visuals and claims on food.
    Abrams KM; Evans C; Duff BR
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():20-9. PubMed ID: 25510529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consumer knowledge and attitudes about genetically modified food products and labelling policy.
    Vecchione M; Feldman C; Wunderlich S
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2015 May; 66(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 25519248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nutrition labelling: a review of research on consumer and industry response in the global South.
    Mandle J; Tugendhaft A; Michalow J; Hofman K
    Glob Health Action; 2015; 8():25912. PubMed ID: 25623608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand.
    Young L; Swinburn B
    Health Promot Int; 2002 Mar; 17(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11847134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Calorie labeling in a rural middle school influences food selection: findings from community-based participatory research.
    Hunsberger M; McGinnis P; Smith J; Beamer BA; O'Malley J
    J Obes; 2015; 2015():531690. PubMed ID: 25874121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of using a nutrition logo on consumption and product evaluation of a sweet pastry.
    Steenhuis IH; Kroeze W; Vyth EL; Valk S; Verbauwen R; Seidell JC
    Appetite; 2010 Dec; 55(3):707-9. PubMed ID: 20678531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Exploring global consumer attitudes toward nutrition information on food labels.
    Wills JM; Schmidt DB; Pillo-Blocka F; Cairns G
    Nutr Rev; 2009 May; 67 Suppl 1():S102-6. PubMed ID: 19453661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationships among grocery nutrition label users and consumers' attitudes and behavior toward restaurant menu labeling.
    Roseman MG; Mathe-Soulek K; Higgins JA
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():274-8. PubMed ID: 24012965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Australian adult consumers' beliefs about plant foods: a qualitative study.
    Lea E; Worsley A; Crawford D
    Health Educ Behav; 2005 Dec; 32(6):795-808. PubMed ID: 16267149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.