244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27030283)
1. A comparison between indirect and objective wear-time assessment of removable orthodontic appliances.
Schott TC; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Mayer N; Weber J; Weimer K
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27030283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation.
Schäfer K; Ludwig B; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Schott TC
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24993614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Young patients' attitudes toward removable appliance wear times, wear-time instructions and electronic wear-time measurements--results of a questionnaire study.
Schott TC; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Mar; 71(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 20354837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased BMI in children-an indicator for less compliance during orthodontic treatment with removable appliances.
von Bremen J; Lorenz N; Ludwig B; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):350-355. PubMed ID: 29471384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study.
Tsomos G; Ludwig B; Grossen J; Pazera P; Gkantidis N
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 23834273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applicative characteristics of new microelectronic sensors Smart Retainer® and TheraMon® for measuring wear time.
Schott TC; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Sep; 71(5):339-47. PubMed ID: 20963543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of patient compliance with Hawley retainers and removable functional appliances during the retention phase.
Schott TC; Schlipf C; Glasl B; Schwarzer CL; Weber J; Ludwig B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 24075661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
Wiedel AP
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compliance with removable orthodontic appliances.
Shah N
Evid Based Dent; 2017 Dec; 18(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 29269817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Use of Microsensors to Assess the Daily Wear Time of Removable Orthodontic Appliances: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Nahajowski M; Lis J; Sarul M
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microelectronic wear-time documentation of removable orthodontic devices detects heterogeneous wear behavior and individualizes treatment planning.
Schott TC; Ludwig B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 25085297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective assessment of compliance with intra- and extraoral removable appliances.
Arreghini A; Trigila S; Lombardo L; Siciliani G
Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 27508935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Questionnaire study of electronic wear-time tracking as experienced by patients and parents during treatment with removable orthodontic appliances.
Schott TC; Schrey S; Walter J; Glasl BA; Ludwig B
J Orofac Orthop; 2013 May; 74(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 23649280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The determinants of wear behavior in treatment with removable orthodontic appliances].
Witt E; Bartsch A; Sahm G; Schneider S
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Dec; 53(6):322-9. PubMed ID: 1487216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microsensor technology to help monitor removable appliance wear.
Ackerman MB; McRae MS; Longley WH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):549-51. PubMed ID: 19361743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of wear time recording on the patient's compliance.
Pauls A; Nienkemper M; Panayotidis A; Wilmes B; Drescher D
Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1002-8. PubMed ID: 23611166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Recommended times for wearing removable appliances--the results of a survey].
Witt E; Bartsch A; Sahm G
Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Apr; 53(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 1577346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment compliance of adolescent orthodontic patients with headgear activator and twin-block appliance assessed prospectively using microelectronic wear-time documentation.
Arponen H; Hirvensalo R; Lindgren V; Kiukkonen A
Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 31982915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objectively measured patient cooperation during early orthodontic treatment: Does psychology have an impact?
Sarul M; Lewandowska B; Kawala B; Kozanecka A; Antoszewska-Smith J
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2017 Nov; 26(8):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29264882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The contemporary use of removable orthodontic appliances.
Ward S; Read MJ
Dent Update; 2004 May; 31(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 15188527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
